Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 2;2(4):207–218. doi: 10.3390/bs2040207

Table 3.

Hierarchical multiple regression models of working memory ability predicting language and autism symptom severity.

Language a SRS b ADOS b
Step 1 (NVIQ) β Step 2 (WM) β Step 1 (NVIQ) β Step 2 (WM) β Step 1 (NVIQ) β Step 2 (WM) β
HFA Group Only; n = 18
Constant 100.990 *** 101.221 *** 100.596 *** 93.752 *** 4.520 4.973
Stanford Binet NVIQ 0.070 0.118 −0.564 −0.522 * 0.504 0.213
WM Composite - 0.601 * - −0.634 * - −0.616 **
R2 0.005 0.364 0.318 0.719 0.095 0.465
F 0.060 3.145 3.271 7.682* 1.477 5.658 *

Note: p < 0.10; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. NVIQ entered in Step 1; WM Composite entered in Step 2. a Language measured using the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, 4th Edition, Core Language (scaled score; [26]). b Symptom severity measured using: Social Responsiveness Scale [27] and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Communication + Social Total Score [28].