Figure 2.

Comparison of AUCs from different simulations. Simulations were carried out with the same set of parameters as in Figure 1 (n₀ = n₁ = 5000, μ₀ = 0, ${\sigma }_0^2=1$, μ₁ = 3, ${\sigma }_0^2=1$, pt = 4), except for that in panel (A) different μ₁ and in panel (B) different pt were used. Values for μ₁ and pt are shown on the x-axis of each panel. The AUC values are averaged over 10 simulations.