Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 13;13(Suppl 5):1–12. doi: 10.4137/CIN.S14060

Table 1.

Frequency of each regulation type in 30,347 candidate networks that fit the SW480 data.

TARGET NODE % OF CANDIDATE NETWORKS WITH REGULATION
CDK1 honokiol
NOT honokiol
NOT P27
NOT P53
P53
10.64%
74.65%
94.24%
81.33%
16.99%
MYC AKT
NOT honokiol
NOT IR
RAS
84.42%
93.45%
100.00%
76.35%
BAX honokiol
NOT AKT
NOT honokiol
NOT P53
P53
73.32%
86.25%
1.11%
21.95%
78.05%
JAGGED HES-P
honokiol
NOT HES-P
NOT honokiol
NOT IR
NOT RAS
RAS
29.57%
0.08%
28.41%
99.00%
100.00%
10.88%
42.27%
NICD honokiol
IR
JAGGED
NOT honokiol
NOT IR\
NOT JAGGED
96.98%
77.36%
99.36%
1.33%
5.03%
0.64%
HES-P hes1-g 100.00%
hes1g HES-P
IR
NICD
NOT HES-P NOT IR
48.77%
59.43%
100.00%
27.82%
16.92%
RAS NOT honokiol
RAS
serum
87.24%
4.34%
50.27%
AKT AKT
NOT honokiol
serum
0.77%
92.80%
63.07%
P27 HES-P
honokiol
NOT HES-P
NOT MYC
P27
41.69%
73.84%
33.09%
92.58%
0.05%
P53 honokiol
IR
MDM2
NOT honokiol
NOT IR
NOT MDM2
21.52%
78.05%
1.39%
0.13%
21.95%
16.54%
MDM2 honokiol
MDM2
NOT H
NOT P53
P53
47.70%
5.96%
30.16%
39.52%
28.63%
PROLIF CDK1 100.00%
APOP BAX 100.00%

Note: Regulations in bold were included in at least 70% of the networks. The presence of the auto-regulation of a node (eg, AKT by AKT) represents the logic rule that allows for constitutive activation of the node. Regulatory nodes preceded by “NOT” indicate inhibitory regulations of the target node, and all others indicate activating regulations of the target node.