Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2014 Dec;24(12):588–596. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000091

Table 3.

Associations between c-MET SNPs and clinical outcome among loco-regional gastric cancer patients (stage IB to stage IV; AJCC 6th) in the Japanese cohort

Disease-free Survival
Overall Survival
SNP N Median, yrs
(95%CI)
3-year of
recurrence
rate ± SE
HR (95%CI) HR (95%CI) Median, yrs
(95%CI)
5-year of
survival
rate ± SE
HR (95%CI) HR (95%CI)
rs41736

  T/T 42 2.9 (1.5, 16.1+) 0.51 ± 0.08 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 4.3 (2.2, 16.1+) 0.45 ± 0.09 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
  T/C 82 20.1+ (2.9, 20.1+) 0.40 ± 0.06 0.71 (0.42, 1.22) 0.58 (0.32, 1.05) 20.1+ (3.4, 20.1+) 0.60 ± 0.06 0.70 (0.39, 1.23) 0.60 (0.33, 1.11)
  C/C 30 2.5 (1.3, 7.1+) 0.52 ± 0.10 1.04 (0.54, 2.01) 0.76 (0.37, 1.55) 2.8 (1.7, 7.1+) 0.44 ± 0.10 1.20 (0.61, 2.35) 0.86 (0.42, 1.78)
    P value           0.32           0.20           0.18           0.25

rs41739

  G/G 49 16.1+ (2.0, 16.1+) 0.46 ± 0.07 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 16.1+ (2.8, 16.1+) 0.54 ± 0.08 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
  G/A 72 20.1+ (2.2, 20.1+) 0.44 ± 0.06 0.92 (0.54, 1.58) 0.74 (0.43, 1.28) 20.1+ (3.1, 20.1+) 0.54 ± 0.07 0.97 (0.54, 1.71) 0.77 (0.43, 1.38)
  A/A 33 2.9 (1.3, 7.1+) 0.51 ± 0.09 1.25 (0.67, 2.33) 0.93 (0.47, 1.82) 4.1 (1.7, 7.1+) 0.46 ± 0.10 1.48 (0.77, 2.82) 1.01 (0.50, 2.04)
    P value           0.60           0.53           0.34           0.60

rs40239

  A/A 96 2.3 (1.6, 20.1+) 0.55 ± 0.05 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 3.4 (2.3, 20.1+) 0.45 ± 0.06 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
  A/G* 53 15.2+ 0.28 ± 0.06 0.43 (0.25, 0.74) 0.48 (0.27, 0.83) 15.2+ (4.3, 15.2+) 0.65 ± 0.07 0.47 (0.27, 0.81) 0.50 (0.28, 0.88)
  G/G* 9
    P value           0.001           0.009           0.006           0.017

rs1621

  A/A 109 20.1+ (2.3, 20.1+) 0.45 ± 0.05 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 20.1+ (3.4, 20.1+) 0.55 ± 0.05 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
  A/G* 44 3.4 (2.0, 9.0+) 0.47 ± 0.07 1.04 (0.63, 1.70) 0.89 (0.54, 1.48) 4.1 (2.7, 9.0+) 0.48 ± 0.08 1.11 (0.66, 1.84) 0.95 (0.56, 1.60)
  G/G* 4
    P value           0.88           0.65           0.70           0.85

rs10234854

  G/G 80 16.1+ (2.9, 16.1+) 0.40 ± 0.06 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 16.1+ (4.3, 16.1+) 0.60 ± 0.06 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
  G/A 54 2.2 (1.3, 20.1+) 0.54 ± 0.07 1.49 (0.90, 2.45) 1.14 (0.67, 1.95) 3.9 (2.3, 20.1+) 0.41 ± 0.08 1.60 (0.94, 2.70) 1.15 (0.66, 2.01)
  A/A 20 6.5+ (1.4, 6.5+) 0.37 ± 0.11 0.82 (0.37, 1.86) 0.73 (0.31, 1.72) 6.5+ (1.9, 6.5+) 0.60 ± 0.12 1.01 (0.44, 2.30) 0.89 (0.37, 2.12)
    P value           0.19           0.58           0.18           0.80

rs184953

  C/C 114 3.4 (2.2, 20.1+) 0.49 ± 0.05 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 5.7 (3.0, 20.1+) 0.52 ± 0.05 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
  C/A* 36 6.1+ (3.0, 6.1+) 0.32 ± 0.07 0.66 (0.37, 1.19) 0.69 (0.37, 1.27) 6.1+ (3.9, 6.1+) 0.54 ± 0.11 0.77 (0.42, 1.39) 0.75 (0.40, 1.39)
  A/A* 6
    P value           0.16           0.23           0.38           0.36
*

Combined in the analysis in the dominant genetic model.

Based on the log-rank test in the univariable analysis and Wald test in the multivariable analysis within Cox regression model.

+

Estimates were not reached.

Adjusted for stage (I, II, III, and IV), gender, age (<65, 65–74, ≥75 as continuous), and type of adjuvant therapy (no vs yes)