Table 1.
Reference | Screening program location | Year (of invitation) | Age | Screened women | Screen-detected cases | Interval cancers | Pct. of initial screens | [Screen-detected per 10.000] | [Interval cancers per 10.000] | Background annual incidence rate per 10.000 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mammography screening evaluation group [5] | Copenhagen, Denmark | 1991-‘93 | 50-69 | 30,362 | 360 | 52 | 100 | 118.6 | 17.3 | 25.4 | 0.34 | 0.13 (0.10-0.16) |
Njor et al. [6] | Funen, Denmark | 1993-‘95 | 50-69 | 41,480 | 398 | 87 | 100 | 95.9 | 21.2 | 24.2 | 0.43 | 0.18 (0.15-0.21) |
Törnberg et al. [7] | Stockholm, Sweden | 1989-‘97 | 50-69 | 188,032 | 1,108 | 382 | 100 | 58.9 | 20.4 | 25.8 | 0.40 | 0.26 (0.24-0.28) |
Törnberg et al. [7] | Four counties, Norway | 1996-‘97 | 50-69 | 126,779 | 852 | 207 | 100 | 67.2 | 16.4 | 20.0 | 0.41 | 0.20 (0.18-0.22) |
Hofvind et al. [4] | NBCSP, Norway | 1996-‘05 | 50-69 | 367,428a | 2,351 | 669 | 100 | 64.0 | 18.3 | 18.0 | 0.51 | 0.22 (0.21-0.23) |
Törnberg et al. [7] | Marseille, France | 1993-‘98 | 50-69 | 103,946 | 483 | 179 | 100 | 46.5 | 17.3 | 20.1 | 0.43 | 0.27 (0.24-0.30) |
Törnberg et al. [7] | Strasbourg, France | 1989-‘97 | 50-65 | 63,235 | 328 | 129 | 100 | 51.9 | 20.5 | 22.6 | 0.45 | 0.28 (0.24-0.32) |
Törnberg et al. [7] | Florence, Italy | 1990-‘94 | 50-69 | 35,754 | 325 | 47 | 100 | 90.9 | 13.3 | 22.2 | 0.30 | 0.13 (0.10-0.16) |
Törnberg et al. [7] | Turin, Italy | 1992-‘96 | 50-69b | 28,804 | 248 | 40 | 100 | 86.1 | 14.0 | 20.2c | 0.35 | 0.14 (0.10-0.18) |
Vettorazzi et al. [8] | Veneto Region, Italy | 1999-‘02 | 50-69 | 94,874d | 683 | 154 | 73 | 72.0 | 16.3 | 27.8 | 0.29 | 0.18 (0.15-0.21) |
Törnberg et al. [7] | Navarra, Spain | 1990-‘96 | 45-65 | 40,665 | 256 | 29 | 100 | 63.0 | 7.2 | 16.2 | 0.22 | 0.10 (0.07-0.13) |
aOnly 367,428 prevalent screens from a total of 467,343 women had 2 years of follow-up.
bAlthough the age group targeted in Turin is 50-69 years, during the period of the study, invitations were restricted to women aged 50-59. A few women had the test shortly after they turned 60.
cBased on the ages 50-64.
dWomen-Years at risk. Follow-up was not complete in the second year of the interval resulting in only 77,979 women-years.