Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2014 Jun 15;426(17):3041–3056. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.06.007

Table 2.

Computational analysis of the interface in RI·RNase complexes

No. of Contacts Residuesc Character of Interface Residuesc [No. (%)]

RI·RNase Complex Buried ASAa2) Scb From RI From RNase Non-polar Uncharged Polar Charged Hydrogen Bondsd (Å) Non-bonded contactse
Humanf 2801 0.688 28 23 17 (33%) 14 (27%) 20 (39%) 19 (2.79) 177
Mouseg 2650 0.645 23 25 15 (30%) 18 (36%) 16 (33%) 13 (2.92) 126
Cowh 2793 0.605 28 25 15 (28%) 17 (32%) 21 (40%) 15 (2.90) 150
Chicken 2757 0.599 26 20 21 (46%) 7 (15%) 18 (39%) 12 (2.90) 118
Pig·Cow 2582 0.590 26 23 14 (29%) 13 (27%) 22 (45%) 8 (3.01) 90
a

Buried accessible surface area (ASA) was calculated with the program PDBsum.

b

The value of Sc reports on geometrical shape complementarity, where Sc = 1.0 for two perfectly complementary surfaces and Sc = 0 for two completely dissimilar surfaces [74]. Sc values were calculated with SC v6.4.

c

Contact residues were identified by PDBsum as non-polar (A,F,G,I,L,M,P,V,W,Y), uncharged polar (C,N,Q,S,T), or charged (D,E,H,K,R).

d

Hydrogen bonds were calculated by the HBPLUS[66] algorithm of PDBsum (rX···X<3.3 Å).

e

Non-bonded contacts were calculated by HBPLUS [66] and defined as any contacts between proteins involving either a carbon or a sulfur atom, where the interaction distance is ≤3.9 Å.

f

Calculations were performed with chain Y (hRI) and chain Z (RNase 1) from PDB entry 1z7x due to the presence of bound citrate in the active site of RNase 1 in the other complex in the asymmetric unit.

g

Calculations represent the average values from four complexes in the asymmetric unit.

h

Calculations represent the average values from two complexes in the asymmetric unit.