Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 14;24(11):1311–1327. doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.131

Table 2. Validated pSNMs in the three individuals.

Individual ID Position Ref base Alt base Whole-genome sequencing
Pyrosequencing
Sanger sequening
Ref read # (%) Alt read # (%) Ref % Alt % Ref clone # Alt clone #
ACC1-II-1 B1 15:80878576 C T 118 (93%) 9 (7%) 91% 9% 41 4
ACC1-II-1 B2 4:165099831 C T 73 (89%) 9 (11%) 90% 10% 105 5
ACC1-II-1 B3 6:85605629 A T 86 (87%) 13 (13%) 90% 10% 75 11
ACC1-II-1 B5 6:154692299 G C 104 (95%) 6 (5%) 87% 13% 91 8
ACC1-II-1 B13 18:70512197 T G 67 (69%) 30 (31%) 64% 36% 29 15
DS1-II-2 F1 17:52287119 G T 89 (88%) 12 (12%) 91% 9% 33 3
DS1-II-2 F2 19:55529705 C T 93 (93%) 7 (7%) 93% 7% 167 2
DS1-II-2 F3 19:56343191 T C 86 (92%) 7 (8%) 96% 4% 82 4
DS1-II-2 F6 14:71380614 T G 73 (92%) 6 (8%) 92% 8% 113 3
DS1-II-2 F7 16:84073033 A C 44 (83%) 9 (17%) 88% 12% 36 4
DS1-II-2 F9 13:79932615 C A 51 (73%) 19 (27%) 77% 23% 25 9
DS1-II-2 F10 2:166848782 G C 38 (76%) 12 (24%) 73% 27% 19 3
DS2-I-1 X1 1:72008400 A G 93 (90%) 10 (10%) 77% 23% 20 3
DS2-I-1 X2 16:64312186 C T 76 (92%) 7 (8%) 88% 12% 24 5
DS2-I-1 X3 X:68611473 C A 47 (90%) 5 (10%) 94% 6% 166 3
DS2-I-1 X6 2:166854673 G T 58 (78%) 16 (22%) 78% 22% 30 8
DS2-I-1 X8 13:89662020 A C 53 (77%) 16 (23%) 82% 18% 45 9