Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 5.
Published in final edited form as: Thromb Haemost. 2012 Oct 23;109(1):24–33. doi: 10.1160/TH12-05-0302

Table 3.

FIX inhibitor risks in Argentine patients with HB.

Mutation Type HB1 [%] Cases2 N=5 Controls3 N=50 IOR4(CI95) IP5(CI95) [%] P value6
Missense 61.5 0 32 0.05(0.003-0.99) 0.4(0.02-3.04) 0.0097**
Splicing defect 7.7 0 4 0.94(0.04-19.9) 2.9(0.15-24.8) 1.0000
Frameshift indel & Leiden 7.7 0 4 0.94(0.04-19.9) 2.9(0.15-24.8) 1.0000
Nonsense 13.5 3 6 11(1.51-79.88) 14.3(4.3-21) 0.0267*
All-large deletions 9.6 2 4 7.67(0.97-60.2) 14.3(3.0-27.5) 0.0864
Entire F9 deletions 3.8 2 1 32.7(2.26-471) 45.0(6.6-75.4) 0.0194*
1

HB [%]: Artificially made unbiased HB population excluding three patients of the Inhibitor Molecular Protocol to estimate the natural mutation type frequencies in Argentine patients with HB.

2

Cases: Long-lasting inhibitor positive cases (high and low responders).

3

Controls: Inhibitor negative or transient.

4

IOR: Inhibitor Likelihood Odds Radio (Mutation positive/Mutation negative), (CI95): Confidence Interval 95%.

5

IP [%]: Absolute inhibitor prevalence, (CI95): Confidence interval 95%. Null hypothesis is 3.05%, which represents the global HB inhibitor prevalence in Argentina.

6

P values: Fisher exact test P value

*

P<0.05 significant

**

P<0.001 highly significant.