Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 28;11:306. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-306

Table 1.

Characteristics of the seven selected studies

Author/year [Ref.]
Line of treatment
Bevacizumab dose
No. of patients
Median PFS (m)
Median OS (m)
ORR (%)
        HTN vs. No HTN HTN vs. No HTN HTN vs. No HTN
Scartozzi M/2009 [20]
First-line
5 mg/kg/2w
39
14.5 vs. 3.1
NA vs. 15.1
75% vs. 32%
Rebekah/2009 [21]
First-line
NA
52
NA vs. NA
NA vs. NA
NA vs. NA
De Stefano/2011 [19]
First-line
5 mg/kg/2w or 7.5 mg/kg/3w
74
15.1 vs. 8.3
35.5 vs. 26.7
84.6% vs. 42.6%
Osterlund P/2011 [17]
First- or second-line
5 mg/kg/2w
101
10.5 vs. 5.3
25.8 vs. 11.7
52.6% vs. 45.5%
Horinouchi Y/2011 [18]
First-line
NA
36
16.25 vs. 10
NA vs. NA
60% vs. 23.1%
Dewdney A/2011 [22]
First-line
7.5 mg/kg/3w
45
NA vs. NA
NA vs. NA
71% vs. 78%
Tahover E/2013 [16] First- or second-line 2. 5 mg/kg/w 181 29.9 vs. 17.2 NA vs. 36.8 NA vs. NA

ORR: Overall response rate; NA: Information not available; PFS: Progression-free survival; OS: Overall survival; HTN: Hypertension group; N0 HTN: No hypertension.