Table 1.
Author/year [Ref.] |
Line of treatment |
Bevacizumab dose |
No. of patients |
Median PFS (m) |
Median OS (m) |
ORR (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTN vs. No HTN | HTN vs. No HTN | HTN vs. No HTN | ||||
Scartozzi M/2009
[20] |
First-line |
5 mg/kg/2w |
39 |
14.5 vs. 3.1 |
NA vs. 15.1 |
75% vs. 32% |
Rebekah/2009
[21] |
First-line |
NA |
52 |
NA vs. NA |
NA vs. NA |
NA vs. NA |
De Stefano/2011
[19] |
First-line |
5 mg/kg/2w or 7.5 mg/kg/3w |
74 |
15.1 vs. 8.3 |
35.5 vs. 26.7 |
84.6% vs. 42.6% |
Osterlund P/2011
[17] |
First- or second-line |
5 mg/kg/2w |
101 |
10.5 vs. 5.3 |
25.8 vs. 11.7 |
52.6% vs. 45.5% |
Horinouchi Y/2011
[18] |
First-line |
NA |
36 |
16.25 vs. 10 |
NA vs. NA |
60% vs. 23.1% |
Dewdney A/2011
[22] |
First-line |
7.5 mg/kg/3w |
45 |
NA vs. NA |
NA vs. NA |
71% vs. 78% |
Tahover E/2013 [16] | First- or second-line | 2. 5 mg/kg/w | 181 | 29.9 vs. 17.2 | NA vs. 36.8 | NA vs. NA |
ORR: Overall response rate; NA: Information not available; PFS: Progression-free survival; OS: Overall survival; HTN: Hypertension group; N0 HTN: No hypertension.