Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2014;54(9):1158–1166. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2011.629352

Table 4.

Summary of data from human studies investigating the effects of RS on TEE. All data relative to a DS meal. A blank cell indicates that this data was not collected.

RS effect on: Population Duration (hours) Energy Intake TEF TEE RQ
Sands et al ((Sands, Leidy et al. 2009)) Healthy M & F 4 Fixed: 50g available CHO =
Ranganthan et al ((Ranganathan 1994)) Healthy M 3
RQ=12
Fixed: 30g total CHO = (^) = (^) = (^)
Keogh et al ((Keogh, Lau et al. 2007)) Healthy F 3 Fixed: SR, MM @ breakfast & lunch = =
Tagliabue et al ((Tagliabue, Raben et al. 1995)) Healthy M 5 Fixed:50g total CHO =
Heijnen et al ((Heijnen, Deurenberg et al. 1995)) Healthy M 5 Fixed: 50g total CHO
Higgins et al ((Higgins, Higbee et al. 2004)) Healthy M & F 24 Fixed: SR, MM =
Howe et al ((Howe, Rumpler et al. 1996)) Healthy & hyperinsulinemic M 14 weeks 24h TEE Fixed: SR, MM 14 weeks, 1g CHO/kg body weight = =

M, males

F, females

CHO, carbohydrate

SR, starch replacement

MM, mixed meal

^

RS4 effects relative to cellulose (fiber)

#

RS2 and RS3 relative to DS