Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 20;92(11):817–825. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.129775

Table 1. Possible study designs for estimating the tuberculosis burden in India.

Study design Possible objectives Existing data used New data collection required Current feasibility Application
Advantages Disadvantages
Inventory study
Retrospective analysisa Quantification of underreporting of diagnosed cases. Estimation of tuberculosis incidence. Demonstration of negligible underreporting National tuberculosis surveillance database plus one or two national case-based databases – the exact number depending on objectives None Not feasible because multiple national case-based databases not available in India      
Survey of sample of all providers, selected using lot-quality assurance samplinga Demonstration of negligible underreporting National tuberculosis surveillance database Provider survey of random sample of all tuberculosis providers, selected using lot-quality assurance sampling Not appropriate because underreporting known to be substantial in India      
Survey of all providers in large areas suitable for capture–recapture analysisa Quantification of underreporting of diagnosed cases. Estimation of tuberculosis incidence National tuberculosis surveillance database plus two other case-based databases for each geographical area selected Provider survey of all tuberculosis providers in random sample of large, self-contained geographical areas Needs to be assessed Generates comprehensive, direct estimate of underreporting at all levels Assumptions regarding migration and probability of inclusion in each database. Error-prone because of reliance on probabilistic matching across multiple databases
Survey of all providers in sampled areasa Quantification of underreporting of diagnosed cases. Demonstration of negligible underreporting National tuberculosis surveillance database Provider survey of all tuberculosis providers in random sample of geographical areas Feasible for quantifying underreporting of diagnosed cases Of the feasible studies, relatively inexpensive because fewer data need to be collected Proportion of cases with no health system utilization estimated from self-reported household survey data. Level of underdiagnosis estimated from other new data collection or existing data with limitations
Survey of all providers in sampled areas with assessment of underdiagnosis Quantification of underreporting and underdiagnosis by RNTCP and non-RNTCP providers National tuberculosis surveillance database Provider survey of all tuberculosis providers in random sample of geographical areas, including assessment of underdiagnosis Feasible Generates direct estimates of the greatest number of the parameters contributing to underreporting Proportion of cases with no health system utilization estimated from self-reported household survey data. More expensive than assessment of only underreporting of diagnosed cases in sampled areas because of additional data collection
National prevalence survey Estimation of national prevalence of active tuberculosis in adults. Assessment of the proportion of tuberculosis cases which are drug-resistant None For nationally representative sample of adults aged ≥  15 years: either Xpert MTB/RIF assay or X-ray screening plus two sputum samples if symptomatic or X-ray abnormal Feasible Generates direct estimate of national tuberculosis prevalence, with potential to assess extent of drug resistance In comparison with other study designs, longer period of data collection and more expensive

RNTCP: Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme.

a Described in detail in the WHO guide for conducting inventory studies.27