Table 6.
P-value | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Incubation time (h) | PCF | GPCF | PFF | GPFF | SEM | F | G | F × G | Animal | Run | |
Dry matter degradation (%) | |||||||||||
2 | 11.0a | 68.7b | 66.1c | 69.3b | 0.32 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.20 | 0.12 | |
4 | 13.4a | 70.2b | 68.3c | 71.1b | 0.47 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.39 | 0.02 | |
8 | 25.7a | 76.4b | 77.9b | 77.6b | 0.87 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.73 | |
16 | 59.5a | 85.4b | 84.9b | 86.2b | 2.65 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.09 | |
24 | 62.6a | 90.5b | 89.1b | 93.6b | 1.78 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.02 | |
48 | 98.5 | 99.3 | 99.1 | 99.3 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.004 | |
Model | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
a (%) | 0.5 | 11 | 64.5 | 62.1 | 64.4 | ||||||
b (%) | 121 | 89 | 39.1 | 39.6 | 38.0 | ||||||
c (h−1) | 0.034 | 0.054 | 0.0459 | 0.0529 | 0.0554 | ||||||
l (h) | 3.8 | ||||||||||
RSD (%) | 6.4 | 12.0 | 0.74 | 1.72 | 1.12 | ||||||
ED (%) | 44.3 | 44.5 | 81.4 | 80.7 | 82.6 | ||||||
Crude protein degradation (%) | |||||||||||
2 | 5.5a | 80.3b | 75.1c | 79.3d | 0.26 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.21 | 0.26 | |
4 | 9.5a | 80.9b | 78.4c | 81.0b | 0.30 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.68 | 0.30 | |
8 | 21.5a | 85.7b | 86.2b | 87.0b | 0.63 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.63 | |
16 | 59.5a | 92.4b | 90.7b | 92.3b | 1.88 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.015 | 1.88 | |
24 | 63.6a | 95.7b | 93.0b | 97.4b | 1.07 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 1.07 | |
48 | 98.6 | nd | nd | nd | |||||||
Model | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
a (%) | −8.5 | 7.5 | 77.1 | 68.6 | 76.2 | ||||||
b (%) | 105.5 | 92.5 | 28.2 | 25.2 | 29.6 | ||||||
c (h−1) | 0.0525 | 0.062 | 0.046 | 0.1375 | 0.0519 | ||||||
l (h) | 5.1 | ||||||||||
RSD (%) | 6.61 | 11.8 | 0.783 | 0.744 | 0.707 | ||||||
ED (%) | 40.7 | 42.2 | 89.3 | 86.1 | 89.9 |
For the fine flours, the degradation was described using only the Ørskov and McDonald model. For the coarse flours, degradation was described using both the Ørskov and McDonald and the McDonald models. Data are presented as LSMEANS ± SEM. PCF, pea coarse flour, obtained with a crushing roller with a 2.5 mm space; GPCF, PCF reground with a screen of 1 mm aperture; PFF, pea fine flour, obtained with hammer mill with a 2 mm screen; GPFF, PFF reground with a screen of 1 mm aperture; F, feed effect (coarse vs. fine); G, regrinding effect; F × G, interaction between feed and regrinding effects; ED, effective degradability; 1, model Ørskov and McDonald (1979); 2, model McDonald (1981) with constraint (a + b) ≤ 100. Mean values in the same row without a common superscript are significantly different at P < 0.05.