Table 4.

Percent Scavenging effect of sesame cake extracts

Samples Conc mg/mL	Scavenging DPPH free radicals
	EM	MM	E50M	M50M	WM	EU	MU	E50U	M50U	WU	BHA
1	27.605 ± 0.756st	27.915 ± 0.968st	18.905 ± 0.205wxy	20.945 ± 0.841vwx	8.06 ± 0.12AB	22.675 ± 0.714uv	28.06 ± 0.127st	25.035 ± 0.148tu	19.125 ± 0.53wxy	11.825 ± 0.445aa	87.475 ± 0.65ab
2	40.71 ± 0.62mn	35.95 ± 0.127op	30.89 ± 0.735rs	36.175 ± 1.421op	12.235 ± 0.37aa	34.37 ± 1.08opq	47.525 ± 0.714jk	31.93 ± 0.113q	33.015 ± 0.233pqr	14.4 ± 1.555zaa	89.265 ± 0.869a
3	48.285 ± 1.718j	44.935 ± 1.053kl	42.31 ± 0.480lm	40.175 ± 0.007mn	12.675 ± 0.657aa	39.595 ± 0.784mn	49.89 ± 0.268ij	37.52 ± 0.692no	41.485 ± 1.859m	18.115 ± 1.223xy	88.92 ± 0.325a
5	58.575 ± 0.106g	56.115 ± 0.65gh	53.06 ± 0.028hi	53.98 ± 0.084h	17.545 ± 0.671yz	59.255 ± 1.265fg	62.425 ± 0.304f	54.365 ± 1.110h	54.62 ± 0.735h	21.535 ± 0.728vw	89.34 ± 0.721a
10	83.48 ± 1.654c	84.54 ± 0.66bc	76.525 ± 0.714d	72.16 ± 0.028e	30.03 ± 0.452rs	79.53 ± 0.692d	88.475 ± 0.304a	76.92 ± 0.183d	71.8 ± 0.537e	33.31 ± 0.707pqr	88.37 ± 0.028a

Different letters in the column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). EM, ethanol-maceration; MM, methanol-maceration; E₅₀M, ethanol:water (50:50)-maceration; M₅₀M, methanol:water (50:50)-maceration; WM, water-maceration; EU, ethanol-ultrasonic; MU, methanol-ultrasonic; E₅₀U, ethanol:water (50:50)-ultrasonic; M₅₀U, methanol:water (50:50)-ultrasonic; WU, water-ultrasonic.