Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Commun. 2013 Oct 24;19(4):392–412. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.811328

Table 4.

Mediation of AlcoholEdu effects on alcohol use and binge drinking during post-intervention fall semester, beta (SE)

Alcohol use frequency Binge drinking frequency

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
Time × Condition −.64 (.29)* −.45 (.29) −.26 (.10)* −.18 (.10)
Time (1=baseline, 2=post- intervention semester .10 (.18) .11 (.18) .05 (.07) .05 (.06)
Intervention condition (0=control, 1=AlcEdu) .87 (.66) .71 (.69) .33 (.18) .25 (.19)
Student covariates
 Age (years) .29 (.13)* .28 (.13)* .01 (.04) .005 (.04)
 Male 1.04 (.15)** 1.11 (.14)** .64 (.08)** .68 (.08)**
 White −.02 (.37) −.01 (.38) .02 (.19) .03 (.20)
 Black −1.76 (.63)** −1.60 (.60)** −.75 (.25)** −.68 (.24)**
 Asian −1.64 (.47)** −1.57 (.49)** −.67 (.20)** −.64 (.22)**
 Hispanic −.17 (.39) −.19 (.40) −.17 (.17) −.19 (.18)
 Living in dormitory .64 (.29)* .59 (.29)* .43 (.09)** .41 (.08)**
 Grade-point average −.97 (.19)** −.86 (.18)** −.31 (.06)** −.27 (.05)**
 Perceived drinking norms --- .23 (.02)** --- .11 (.008)**
College covariates
 Midwest region −.45 (.32) −.60 (.35) −.11 (.10) −.19 (.11)
 Urban/suburban .35 (.42) .29 (.41) .03 (.14) .04 (.12)
 Public institution .21 (.97) .11 (1.06) .08 (.32) .12 (.34)
 Religious institution .59 (.66) .66 (.67) .38 (.21) .41 (.21)
 Student population size .0005 (.0004) .0007 (.0004) .0001 (.0001) .0002 (.0001)
 % white .02 (.01)* .01 (.01) .007 (.004) .005 (.003)
 % male .005 (.04) .01 (.04) .009 (.01) .01 (.01)
 % living on campus .01 (.02) .01 (.02) .003 (.008) .005 (.008)
 % in Greek organization .006 (.03) .01 (.03) −.003 (.009) −.0009 (.01)
 Survey response rate −.002 (.02) −.002 (.02) −.007 (.006) −.002 (.006)
*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01