Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 9;9:95. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0095-2

Table 1.

Patient baseline data collected before surgery

Data Control n =138 gPCC n =128 p value Data Control n =138 gPCC n =128 p value
Female/male 89/49 83/45 0.9 Type of living 0.02*
Mean age 66 68 0.1 Flat 62 74
Standard Deviation 13,9 12 House 75 52
Living with someone 90 68 0.6 Service flat 1 2
Living alone 46 56
Employment status 0.2 Need of assistance from relative 1.0
Employed 32 33 Yes 71 67
Retired 84 79 No 57 54
Disability pension 16 5
Other 3 6
Contact with relatives 0.8 Need of community home help 0.7
Weekly 129 120 None 120 115
Weekly to monthly 6 4 Once a week 6 6
<monthly 2 2 Daily or more 7 4
Home nursing 0.1 Assistive aids for personal use such as pincers, seat cushions and so on 0.4
Yes 1 4 Yes 46 51
No 132 120 No 44 61
Emergency medical alarm at home 0.7 Pre-fracture independence†† 0.9
Yes 15 9 80–100% 132 117
No 97 113 60–79% 3 7
<60% 3 3
Mean 92 92
SD 13 16
Number of co-morbidities 0.06 Type of walking aid 0.5
Median 1 1 None 44 42
Min 0 0 Crutches 64 54
Max 6 9 Walking frame 14 19
Wheel chair 3 4
ASA grade 0.1 Previous hip replacement in contralateral hip 0.4
1 36 22 Yes 47 32
2 75 69 No 91 95
3 27 16
Using naturopathic preparation 1.0 Feeling healthy 0.7
Yes 116 107 Yes 78 77
No 19 17 No 19 16

*In this variable there was a significant difference between the groups.

†Measured by the Ceder scale [15].

†† Measured by the Functional Recovery Scale [12].

The missing data in some of the variables was regarded as not having an impact on the overall results.

gPCC Gothenburg person-centred care.