Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 27;13:1096. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1096

Table 1.

Objectively measured family dog walking behaviour for intervention and control groups

 
Baseline
Follow-up
 
 
 
 
Intervention mean (SD)
Control mean (SD)
Intervention mean (SD)
Control mean (SD)
Intervention –control difference (95% CI)
p value‡
Effect size (Cohen’s d)
  N = 15 N = 12 N = 15 N = 12      
Number of walks per week
2.7 (2.1)
2.6 (2.6)
2.6 (1.2)
2 (1.7)
0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
0.19
0.23
Total duration of dog walking (mins/week)
53 (58)
25 (29)
47 (37)
23 (23)
-4 (-25, 17)
0.12
0.10
Child mean accelerometer cpm* during dog walking
2117 (1289)
1953 (1136)
2784 (1279)
2490 (1724)
130 (-539, 799)
0.41
0.10
% time child spent walk in MVPA†
22.1 (21.4)
18.9 (18.6)
26.1 (21.7)
15.2 (21.7)
7.7 (-1.7, 17.1)
0.12
0.32
Parent mean accelerometer cpm* during dog walking
1996 (1673)
1518 (1205)
2216 (1237)
1601 (976)
137 (-486, 760)
0.39
0.10
% time parent spent walk in MVPA§
45.3 (41.2)
31.7 (34.5)
42.0 (30.8)
20.3 (23.8)
8.1 (-6.4, 22.6)
0.11
0.22
Dog mean accelerometer cpm* during dog walking
3595 (2031)
3549 (2572)
4558 (1746)
3766 (2155)
746 (-345, 1837)
0.39
0.27
% time dog spent in light-mod PA¶
60.4 (34.5)
69.4 (39.3)
55.2 (32.4)
37.6 (40.1)
26.6 (6.8, 46.4)
0.06
0.53
% time dog spent in vigorous PA** 19.6 (17.7) 13.9 (23.2) 24.7 (17.3) 12.7 (19.6) 6.3 (-4.2, 16.8) 0.03 0.24

*cpm = counts per minute.

†≥3200 accelerometer cpm.

§≥1952 accelerometer cpm.

¶1352–5965 accelerometer cpm.

**≥5696 accelerometer cpm.

‡Intervention and control groups were compared using analysis of covariance.

Of the 28 families recruited, 1 parent and 1 dog (from the same family) returned invalid accelerometry data at baseline and were excluded from analysis.