Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 6;10(11):e1003914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003914

Figure 3. Simulation results from mean field coupled oscillator model.

Figure 3

All curves are calculated by solving EQ 2 (for additional details also see EQ 11). The magnitude of the first order parameter, Inline graphic shown in red, can be easily calculated from the individual order parameters, Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Here, Inline graphic is related to the first order parameter in Figure 2, also shown in red (note the subscript was dropped for convenience). (A) Simulation results of Inline graphic for configuration one (config 1, solid) and configuration two (confg 2 dashed). Here config 1 relates to cluster one having negative coupling (Inline graphic). Note that the synchronization was stable only in config 1. We also show the incoherent result when configuration two (Inline graphic) was set near, the steady-state value. The top plots show the values of Inline graphic for both cluster 1 (green) and 2 (blue) on the unit circle at time = 1, 12 and 40 days. Note that the clusters are out-of-phase. A movie of the individual oscillators corresponding to configuration 1 is available as Supplementary file S2. (B) A simulated bifurcation analysis of the model showing the stable attractors for Inline graphic at different values of Inline graphic (red dots). We note that the simulation results agree with the analytical results of Inline graphic, loss of the incoherent state, and Inline graphic, the upper bound of the wave state. The estimated period of the hair cycle is shown by the dashed line. The values corresponding to the observed hair system are highlighted, note that it is near a critical change in Inline graphic that corresponds to a sharp decrease in the period.