Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 6;9(11):e110395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110395

Table 1. Study equipment chosen including the required features, advantages and alternatives available or recommended in the literature.

Item Specific Choice Features Advantages Alternatives
Digital Camera Panasonic LUMIX DMC-TZ8 14.5 megapixel digital camera (figure 1) Macro to 3 cm from a 12X zoom lens equivalent to a 25–300 mm lens on an SLR Inexpensive Digital single lens reflex (SLR) camera [32]
Built in flash Readily available
Rugged metal casing Automatic
Lithium ion rechargeable battery Pre-specified settings to achieve uniform, reproducible images whilst using amateur photographers
4GB memory card
Background Grey background (figure 4) A small grey board positioned behind the body part being assessed Transportable and light weight Green or grey surgical drapes [33]
Manoeuvrable
Non-reflective
Neutral
Scale [34][36] 5cm, non-reflective grey scale (figure 2) Vertical scale Defined the upper and lower boundaries of the photograph (figure 2) Paper or commercially available scale e.g. the ABFO scale [34]
Single use sticker Easily removed and discarded
Good infection control
Identification Card Cardboard handwritten card (figure 3) Pre-formatted to add individual randomisation number, study visit day, sore number, date and time of image capture Maintained study blinding
Photographed prior to impetigo image capture to avoid inclusion of any identifying details in the image for scoring by blinded reviewers[37]
When forgotten, identification card was photographed upside down immediately after the series of sores was captured [37]