Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 7;20(41):15110–15118. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15110

Table 3.

Randomized studies of gemcitabine and S-1 therapy vs gemcitabine for metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Study Treatment n ORR PFS (mo) MST (mo)
GEST[10] GS 275 29%b 5.7b 10.1
(PIII) S-1 280 21%a 3.8c 9.7d
GEM 277 13% 4.1 8.8
GEMSAP[24] GS 53 18.9% 5.4a 13.5
(rPII) GEM 53 9.4% 3.6 8.8
JACCRO PC-01[25] (rPII) GS 53 28.3%b 6.15b 13.7a
GEM 59 6.8% 3.78 8.0
Sudo et al[26] GS 51 21.6%a 5.3a 8.6
GEM 50 6.0% 3.8 8.6
a

P < 0.05 vs GEM;

b

P < 0.01 vs GEM;

c

P < 0.05 non-inferiority to GEM;

d

P < 0.01 non-inferiority to GEM. PFS: Progression-free survival; MST: Median survival time; GEM: Gemcitabine; GS: Gemcitabine and S-1; ORR: Objective response rate.