Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 24;289(45):31397–31410. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.576819

TABLE 3.

IC50 values, relative resistance, and reversal of resistance of CCCP and 2-DG in HEK-293 parental cells and in HEK-ABCG2 cells

Compound IC50
p value of IC50 from HEK-ABCG2 cells relative to IC50 from control cellsa Relative resistanceb Reversal of resistancec
HEK-293 control HEK- ABCG2
CCCP alone 2.3 ± 0.4 μm 2.4 ± 0.3 μm 0.32 1.0 ± 0.2-fold
CCCP + 2 μm curcumin 1.8 ± 0.2 μm 1.7 ± 0.2 μm 0.16 0.9 ± 0.2-fold 1.1 ± 0.3-fold
2-DG alone 4.0 ± 0.6 mm 4.2 ± 0.9 mm 0.27 1.0 ± 0.3-fold
2-DG + 2 μm curcumin 2.1 ± 0.3 mm 2.0 ± 0.4 mm 0.18 1.0 ± 0.2-fold 1.0 ± 0.4-fold

a To determine p values, we used a two-tailed Student's t test based on log(IC50) values. We considered p values ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant.

b Expressed as the ratio of the IC50 value of ABCG2-expressing cells to that of the control cells.

c Expressed as the ratio of the relative resistance value of ABCG2-expressing cells in the absence of the second compound to the relative resistance in its presence.