Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 24;289(45):31397–31410. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.576819

TABLE 4.

Effect of rotenone or antimycin A on the viability, relative resistance, and reversal of resistance of HEK-ABCG2 and parental cells

Compound IC50
Relative resistancea Sensitization/reversal of resistanceb
HEK-293 control HEK-ABCG2
Rotenone alone 6.9 ± 1.8 nm 4.6 ± 1.6 nm 0.7 ± 0.3-fold
Rotenone + 2 μm curcumin + 35 nm gA 9.3 ± 3.4 nm 4.4 ± 1.5 nm 0.5 ± 0.2-fold 1.4 ± 0.9-fold
Rotenone + 2 μm curcumin + 7.5 nm ouabain 6.4 ± 1.9 nm 4.5 ± 1.4 nm 0.7 ± 0.3-fold 0.9 ± 0.6-fold
Antimycin A alone 6.0 ± 2.1 mm 4.0 ± 2.0 mm 0.7 ± 0.3-fold
Antimycin A + 2 μm curcumin + 35 nm gA 1.6 ± 0.7 mm 1.3 ± 0.4 mm 0.8 ± 0.4-fold 0.8 ± 0.6-fold
Antimycin A + 2 μm curcumin + 7.5 nm ouabain 2.0 ± 1.0 mm 1.8 ± 1.0 mm 0.9 ± 0.6-fold 0.8 ± 0.7-fold

a Expressed as the ratio of the IC50 value of ABCG2-expressing cells to that of the control cells.

b Expressed as the ratio of the relative resistance value of ABCG2-expressing cells in the absence of the second compound to the relative resistance in its presence.