Table 1.
Demographic and clinical background data in original sample and follow-up sample
| Variable |
Overall sample |
2-year follow-up |
|---|---|---|
|
(Beidas et al.,[6]; |
Sample |
|
| N = 115) | (N = 50) | |
| |
n (%) |
n (%) |
| Sex |
|
|
| Male |
11 (9.6%) |
4 (8%) |
| Female |
104 (90.4%) |
46 (92%) |
| Race |
|
|
| Caucasian |
77 (67%) |
37 (74%) |
| African American |
15 (13%) |
4 (8%) |
| Hispanic/Latino* |
6 (5.2%) |
0 |
| Asian |
5 (4.3%) |
4 (8%) |
| Native American/Alaskan |
1 (.9%) |
0 |
| Other |
6 (5.2%) |
2 (4%) |
| Missing |
5 (4.3%) |
3 (6%) |
| Educational Status |
|
|
| Enrolled in graduate school |
18 (15.7) |
9 (18%) |
| Master’s degree |
72 (62.6%) |
32 (64%) |
| Doctor of philosophy |
6 (5.2%) |
3 (6%) |
| Doctor of psychology |
5 (4.3%) |
2 (4%) |
| Doctor of education |
2 (1.7%) |
2 (4%) |
| Medical doctor |
6 (5.2%) |
1 (2%) |
| Other degree |
6 (5.2%) |
1 (2%) |
| State Licensed |
33 (28.7%) |
15 (30%) |
| Previously treated anxious youth |
58 (50.4%) |
29 (58%) |
| |
M (SD) |
M (SD) |
| Age |
35.93 (11.36) |
35.09 (10.85) |
| Months of clinical experience |
65.46 (82.38) |
69.59 (86.85) |
| Identification with CBT |
4.86 (1.68) |
4.77 (2.02) |
| Caseload |
19.48 (23.72) |
18.65 (18.15) |
| Supervision per weeka |
1.57 (2.66) |
1.29 (1.33) |
| Hour attendance at workshops |
28.83 (76.18) |
15.97 (19.54) |
| Previous supervision on CBT | 0 | 0 |
Note. CBT = cognitive-behavioral therapy.
*Significant difference found between follow-up participants and non-participants.
aNo additional details regarding type of supervision and/or topic of training workshops were gathered. However, it is worth noting that an exclusionary criterion for the Beidas et al. (2012) study was participating in more than 8 hours of previous training in CBT for child anxiety [6].