Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 22;12:116. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0116-1

Table 3.

Content and face validity of each patient-reported outcome measure

PRO Instrument Content and face validity evaluated with SLE patients using cognitive debriefing methodology Item wording acceptable Recall period acceptable for patient population Response options acceptable
SLE-specific HRQoL
 
 
 
 
SLAQ




LupusQoL




LupusPRO




L-QoL




SLEQOL

✗ ‘Fatigue’ not defined

✗ Confusing
Generic HRQoL
 
 
 
 
SF-36v2




EQ-5D#




Fatigue
 
 
 
 
FACIT-Fatigue




MFI


✗ ‘Lately’ too vague
✗ Confusing
MAF

✗ ‘Fatigue’ not defined

✗ Confusing
Pain
 
 
 
 
MPQ

✗ Complex terms used

✗ Complex terms used
BPI-SF


✗ Some items don’t specify recall

Depression
 
 
 
 
BDI

✗ No question wording
✗ None specified
✗ Lengthily
HADS




Work productivity
 
 
 
 
WPAI:Lupus ✗ Some complex terms used

SLAQ – Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire, SF-36v2 – Short Form [36] Health Survey, EQ-5D – EuroQol 5-Dimensions, FACIT-Fatigue - Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy, MFI – Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, MAF – Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue, MGQ – McGill Pain Scale, BPI – Brief Pain Inventory, BDI – Beck Depression Inventory, HADS – Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, WPAI:Lupus – Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Lupus. #Result valid for both the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L.