Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 20;33(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13046-014-0060-2

Table 1.

Clinicopathologic features of high-grade serous carcinoma with and without STICHGSC: high-grade serous carcinoma; STIC: serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma

 
HGSC w/ STIC (n = 48)
HGSC w/o STIC (n = 62)
P
  No. (%) patients
Age (y) mean ± SD
57.2 ± 2.78
67.1 ± 2.32
< 0.005
≦40
4
2
 
41-50
9
6
 
51-60
18
11
 
61-70
10
22
 
> 70
7
21
 
STIC locations
 
 
 
Left tube
12
 
 
Right tube
29
 
 
Bilateral tubes
7
 
 
Invasive locations^
 
 
 
Left
3
4
 
Right
5
6
 
Bilateral
37
52
> 0.05
Cancer size (cm) mean ± SD
 
 
 
Fallopian tube
0.55 ± 0.21
2.66 ± 0.72
< 0.05
Ovary
3.42 ± 0.52
4.35 ± 0.64
> 0.05
Stage
 
 
 
I
4
0
< 0.05
II
5
3
> 0.05
III
39
51
> 0.05
IV
0
8
< 0.05
Breast cancer history
8
7
 
Family history
12
12
 
Prophylactic BSO 5 0  

^indicating the adnexal location of those invasive cancers. Among the 48 STIC patients, 3 showed STIC only without invasive component. w/: with; w/o: without.

For those cases without gross lesions in the fallopian tube, the lesion size was measured microscopically.