Table 1.
Regression on the cause-specific hazard functiona [HR (95% CI); P-value] | Regression on the CIFb [sHR (95% CI); P-value] | |
---|---|---|
Event: first appropriate ICD therapy | ||
Covariates | ||
Age (for each 10-year increase) | 1.23 (1.07–1.41); P = 0.003 | 1.19 (1.05–1.36); P = 0.006 |
Secondary prevention (compared with primary) | 2.29 (1.60–3.27); P < 0.001 | 2.23 (1.58–3.14); P < 0.0001 |
Event: death without prior ICD therapy | ||
Covariates | ||
Age (for each 10-year increase) | 1.63 (1.11–2.39); P = 0.01 | 1.40 (0.92–2.13); P = 0.12 |
Secondary prevention (compared with primary) | 1.25 (0.54–2.89); P = 0.60 | 0.92 (0.39–2.15); P = 0.85 |
Composite endpoint: first appropriate ICD therapy or prior death | ||
Covariates | ||
Age (for each 10-year increase) | 1.28 (1.12–1.45); P < 0.001 | 1.28 (1.12–1.45); P < 0.001 |
Secondary prevention (compared with primary) | 2.11 (1.52–2.93); P < 0.001 | 2.11 (1.52–2.93); P < 0.001 |
Note that the effect on the hazard function and the CIF is identical for the composite endpoint for which no competing risks are present.
HR, (cause-specific) hazard ratio; sHR, ratio of the subdistribution hazards; CI, confidence interval.
aCox proportional hazards models for cause-specific hazards for competing risks endpoints. Cox proportional hazards model for the composite endpoint.
bFine-Gray regression for competing risks endpoints. Cox proportional hazards model for the composite endpoint.