Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 27;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-114

Table 3.

Adjusted mean difference (95% CI) in PA between men fearful of falling vs not, (n = 1398) 1

Fear of falling vs no fear of falling Steps/day Sedentary (minutes/day) Light (minutes/day) MVPA (minutes/day)
model 1 = fear of falling -1766(-2142,-1391) 45(34,56) -27(-36,-18) -18(-22,-13)
model 2 = model 1+ exercise outcome expectations -1280(-1647,-913) 32(21,43) -19(-28,-11) -13(-17,-8)
model 3 = model 1+ exercise self-efficacy -846(-1219,-472) 24(13,36) -16(-25,-7) -8(-13,-4)
model 4 = model 1+ number of days leave the house -1302(-1678,-926) 32(21,43) -19(-28,-10) -13(-18,-9)
model 5 = model 1+ mobility limitations -1154(-1561,-746) 27(15,39) -14(-24,-5) -12(-17,-7)
model 6 = model 1+ history of falls -1705(-2105,-1305) 43(31,55) -26(-35,-17) -17(-22,-12)
model 7 = model 1+ depression -1434(-1814,-1053) 34(23,46) -20(-29,-11) -15(-19,-10)
model 8 = model 1+ quality of life -1053(-1462,-644) 30(17,42) -19(-29,-10) -10(-15,-6)
model 9 = model 1+ all -201(-607,205) 4(-8,17) -2(-12,8) -2(-7,3)

1coefficients from random effects regression models, accounting for clustering within person; wear days (range 3-7 days) at level 1 and all other variables at level 2.

Model 1 = fear of falling+ minutes of accelerometer wear time + region of residence + day order + age +season of wear.

Model 9 = Model 1+exercise outcome expectations+ exercise self-efficacy+ number of days leave the house+ mobility limitations+ falls+ depression+ quality of life.