Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 9;7(1):69–73. doi: 10.1111/cts.12135

Table 4.

Individual session ratings by participant type for 2011 scientific leadership and management course

Respondents selecting Excellent or Very Good*
Session Laboratory‐based Clinical/Translational All
Day 1
MBTI small group breakout activity
Relevance 89% 93% 91%
Value 86% 90% 88%
Influencing others up, down, and out; motivating others; managing conflict and leading up
Relevance 96% 93% 94%
Value 90% 83% 87%
Relevance—Case Study 1 Small group breakout 72% 71% 72%
Relevance—Case Study 2 Small group breakout 75% 71% 73%
Day 2
Vision: Advancing your research program
Relevance 85% 80% 83%
Value 78% 86% 81%
Time management
Relevance 82% 95% 86%
Value 83% 90% 85%
Staffing your research group: recruiting the best
Relevance 69% 86% 74%
Value 57% 88% 68%
Case studies in small groups
Relevance 62% 71% 64%
Value 62% 65% 63%
Difficult conversations and negotiations
Relevance 88% 100% 91%
Value 85% 100% 90%
Goal setting for leadership development
Relevance 70% 90% 77%
Value 70% 89% 76%

*Percents are calculated based on the number of participants who answered each question rather than on the number of participants enrolled in the course, with a range of 63–110 respondents per question.