Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 2;4(18):3583–3595. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1189

Table 1.

Relationship between clutch size and nest base area in different studies and their 95% confidence intervals (CI)

Relationship Species F df P Estimate (SE) 95% CI
A. Clutch size and base area in choice test (Löhrl 1973) Parus major 28.61 1, 49 <0.0001 0.0088 (0.0016) 0.0056, 0.0120
B. Clutch size and base area when box is exchanged during laying (Löhrl 1980) Parus major 6.48 1, 18 0.020 0.0264 (0.0104) 0.0045, 0.0483
C. Clutch size and change in base area when box is exchanged during laying (Löhrl 1980) Parus major 6.48 1, 18 0.020 0.0132 (0.0052) 0.0033, 0.0241
D. Clutch size and base area in studies based on two or more nest box sizes Parus major, Cyanistes caeruleus, Ficedula hypoleuca, Ficedula albicollis 6.50 1, 68 <0.0001 0.0036 (0.0014) 0.0009, 0.0063
E. Clutch size and base area in all studies of four secondary hole nesters Parus major, Cyanistes caeruleus, Ficedula hypoleuca, Ficedula albicollis 3.37 1, 3371 0.067 −0.0211 (0.0115) −0.044, 0.0014
F. Clutch size and base area in great tit Parus major 24.31 1, 1434 <0.0001 0.0071 (0.0014) 0.0044, 0.0098
G. Clutch size and base area in blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus 2.11 1, 382.2 0.15 −0.0038 (0.0026) −0.0089, 0.0013
H. Clutch size and base area in pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca 0.65 1, 22.41 0.43 −0.0016 (0.0020) −0.0055, 0.0023
I. Clutch size and base area in collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis 0.00 1, 32.29 0.99 0.000013 (0.0020) −0.0039, 0.0039
J. Clutch size and base area in all open-nesting species Open-nesters 9.90 1, 25 0.0037 0.0033 (0.0010) 0.0013, 0.0054
K. Clutch size and base area in all species All species 12.51 1, 114 0.0006 0.0036 (0.0010) 0.0056, 0.0063