Table 1. Mode of presentation in children with rickets in case series published since 2000.
| Study | Country | Time period of study | Number of children | Age range | Presenting feature, n (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fracture | Skeletal Deformity | Hypocalcaemic Seizure | |||||
| Agarwal, 2009[112] | India | 2006-2008 | 51 | 10-13y | 3 (5.9) | 19 (37.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| Ahmed, 2010[3] | UK | 2002-2008 | 160 | 2w-14y | 11 (6.9) | 64 (40.0) | 19 (11.9) |
| Al-Atawi, 2009[45] | Saudi Arabia | 1990-2000 | 283 | 6-14m | 4 (1.4) | NR | 98 (40.3) |
| Al-Jurayyan, 2002[46] | Saudi Arabia | 1994-1999 | 42 | 6-18y | 3 (7.1) | 5 (11.9) | NR |
| Beck-Nielsen, 2009[47] | Denmark | 1985-2005 | 112 | 0-15y | 5 (4.5) | NR | 15 (13.4) |
| Blok, 2000[44] | New Zealand | 1998 | 18 | 3-36m | 1 (5.6) | 7 (53.8) | 3 (16.7) |
| Chapman, 2010[49] | USA | 2000-2007 | 32 | 2-24m | 7 (21.9) | NR | NR |
| Hatun, 2005[113] | Turkey | 2001-2003 | 47 | 0-3m | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 33 (78.7) |
| Lazol, 2008[6] | USA | 1995-2005 | 58 | 2-132m | 9 (15.5) | 23 (39.7) | 7 (12.1) |
| Miyako, 2005[48] | Japan | 1992-2001 | 10 | 2-31m | 2 (20.0) | 7 (70.0) | 2 (20.0) |
| Mylott, 2004[43] | USA | 1996-2004 | 51 | 4-24m | 5 (9.8) | 14 (27.4) | 5 (9.8) |
| Narchi, 2001[114] | Saudi Arabia | 1996-1997 | 21 | 11-15y | 0 (0.0) | 2 (9.5) | NR |
| Pedersen, 2003[51] | Denmark | 1990-1999 | 40 | 6m-15y | 5 (12.5) | 17 (42.5) | 2 (5.0) |
| Robinson, 2006[4] | Australia | 1993-2003 | 126 | 0-15y | 5 (4.0) | 28 (22.2) | 42 (33.3) |
| Thacher, 2013[5] | USA | 1970-2009 | 17 | 0-3y | 0 (0.0) | 8 (47.1) | 2 (11.8) |
| Tomaschek, 2001[115] | Georgia | 1997-1999 | 5 | 8-21m | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (40.0) |
| Ward, 2007[22] | Canada | 2002-2004 | 104 | 0-7y | 11 (10.6) | 44 (42.3) | 20 (19.2) |
|
| |||||||
| ALL STUDIES | 1177 | 71 (6.0) | 238 (31.7) a | 250 (23.1) a | |||
NR – not reported
(a) Percentage calculated from studies in which mode of presentation was reported