TABLE II.
The average (standard deviation) of DSC between the results obtained with three different user interactions for the 30 testing images. The best performance among the comparison methods is highlighted as boldface.
| WVA | WVL | LapRLS + noFS | LapRLS + RFS | LapRLS + FS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ex.1 with Ex.2 | 0.924 | 0.937 | 0.938 | 0.928 | 0.942 |
| (0.0487) | (0.0286) | (0.0312) | (0.0316) | (0.0259) | |
| Ex.2 with Ex.3 | 0.92 | 0.926 | 0.928 | 0.918 | 0.935 |
| (0.0545) | (0.0465) | (0.0423) | (0.043) | (0.0397) | |
| Ex.1 with Ex.3 | 0.915 | 0.926 | 0.929 | 0.914 | 0.932 |
| (0.0445) | (0.0362) | (0.0361) | (0.0391) | (0.0321) |