Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 15;41(6):655–673. doi: 10.1007/s10928-014-9392-y

Table 6.

Properties and performance of the linear quadrature, optimal in the minimax sense, compared to the optimal trapezoid and GL or CC approaches for Model 5

n cv[%] Method Objective Bias RMSRE Maximum deviance Maximum relative deviance
6 10 optimal 4.40E−2 −0.202 4.22E−2 −28.3 .1559
opt. trap. 4.52E−2 −1.567 4.45E−2 −31.1 −.1635
GL 5.54E−2 −0.030 4.85E−2 30.3 .1881
5 optimal 2.24E−2 −0.251 2.16E−2 −13.5 −.0876
opt. trap. 2.49E−2 −1.229 2.36E−2 −15.2 −.0956
GL 2.77E−2 −0.019 2.40E−2 15.5 .1110
0 optimal 4.67E−5 −0.0004 2.21E−5 9.43E−2 4.65E−5
opt. trap. 1.47E−2 −1.3228 1.05E−2 −2.827 1.47E−2
GL 5.03E−4 0.0133 1.45E−4 0.026 4.90E−4
4 10 optimal 5.39E−2 0.325 5.14E−2 −39.2 .2087
opt. trap. 6.00E−2 −2.808 5.80E−2 −38.9 −.2236
GL 6.64E−2 0.357 5.73E−2 −38.0 .2132
5 optimal 2.73E−2 0.641 2.65E−2 19.1 .1082
opt. trap. 3.69E−2 −2.358 3.32E−2 −21.6 −.1324
GL 3.54E−2 0.433 2.92E−2 −22.3 .1142
0 optimal 6.87E−4 −0.021 3.76E−4 0.14 6.85E−4
opt. trap. 2.61E−2 −2.271 1.80E−2 −5.26 −2.60E−2
GL 1.42E−2 0.466 4.90E−3 0.75 1.40E−2
2 10 optimal 0.078 0.64 0.074 −50.5 .3123
opt. trap. 0.144 −11.78 0.120 −66.4 .4163
GL 0.203 10.42 0.123 58.9 .4326
5 optimal 0.045 1.37 0.039 30.3 .1656
opt. trap. 0.128 −11.87 0.101 −48.9 −.2419
GL 0.180 10.39 0.099 40.0 .2712
0 optimal 4.02E−3 0.12 2.17E−3 −0.88 .0040
opt. trap. 1.23E−1 −11.96 9.41E−2 −22.93 −.1220
GL 1.72E−1 10.41 8.96E−2 12.10 .1633