Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 10;4:6984. doi: 10.1038/srep06984

Table 3. Relationship between patterns of contrast-enhancement and WHO histologic subtypes.

Variable A (n = 7) AB (n = 26) B1 (n = 22) B2 (n = 24) B3 (n = 15) Thymic Carcinoma (n = 47) P-value
CEmax              
Mean ± sd(HU) 41.1 ± 15.8a 33.0 ± 9.6b 23.0 ± 8.7c 22.0 ± 8.2c 20.9 ± 9.5c 23.6 ± 9.1c 0.000*
Pattern of CE - no.(%)             0.000
Mild 2(8) 10(45.5) 14(58) 8(53) 16(34)  
Moderate 3(43) 15(57) 10(45.5) 9(38) 6(40) 29(62)  
Strong 4(57) 9(35) 2(9) 1(4) 1(7) 2(4)  

*P-values were calculated by one-way ANOVA; the different alphabet represented a significant difference between the two groups;

P-values were calculated by Monte Carlo Test.

CEmax: maximal contrast-enhanced range; CE: contrast enhancement.