Table 4.
Impact of expressing on breastfeeding outcomes
Author, year, country | Design | Location, participants, year of study and recruitment | Study aims and outcome measures | Results | Strengths/Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chapman et al. 2001 USA [45] |
RCT |
Hartford, Connecticut |
Effects of expressing before the onset of lactation : |
- No significant difference in milk transfer or breastfeeding duration between women who expressed breast milk and those who did not. |
Only women who had a caesarean section |
n = 60 |
- on early milk transfer |
- Primiparous women in pumping group breastfed for 5 months less than those in control group but this finding was not statistically significant. |
Study underpowered for primiparous women |
||
1997–1998 |
- on subsequent breastfeeding duration |
|
|
||
Convenience sample 8–24 hours post Caesarean Section |
|
|
|
||
Schwartz et al. 2002 USA [42] |
Prospective cohort |
Detroit, Ann Arbor and Southfield, Michigan and Omaha, Nebraska |
- Determine demographic, behavioural and clinical factors associated with weaning from breast in the first 12 weeks |
- Michigan women (n = 711) who expressed breast milk were 3 times more likely to wean than those who didn’t (Hazard Ratio: 3.0 95% CI 1.3,6.7) |
Large study |
n = 946 |
|
- Nebraska women (n = 235) showed no association between pumping and weaning (HR: 0.6, 95% CI 0.3,1.5) |
Only measured to 12 weeks |
||
1994–1998 |
|
|
Non-representative sample |
||
Recruitment: |
|
|
Michigan group were recruited from an alternative birthing centre and were significantly more likely to be older than 30 years, have a bachelor’s degree, have 3 or more children and have had a vaginal birth |
||
Michigan - at birth centre orientation |
|
|
|
||
Nebraska - on maternity leave application to large company |
|
|
|
||
Ortiz 2004 USA [37] |
Clinical audit |
Burbank, California |
- Duration of breast milk feeding related to a range of employee chosen lactation support options |
- 98% (452/ 462) breastfeeding initiation |
Large study over 4.5 years |
n = 462 |
- 74% (246/332) expressed milk until infant at least 6 months |
Limited differentiation between breastfeeding and expressing / breast milk feeding |
|||
1993–1999 |
- 24% (81/332) expressed milk until infant at least 12 months |
No information re any other infant feeding/exclusivity of breast milk feeding |
|||
Antenatal recruitment in workplace |
- Mean age of infants at maternal cessation of pumping at work 6.3 months |
No consideration of options in the workplace to breastfeed at the breast |
|||
Geraghty et al. 2005 USA [1] |
Retrospective cohort |
Cincinnati, Ohio |
Measure breast pump use |
Of breast milk feeding mothers: |
Large sample size |
n = 346 |
Identify relationships between breast pump use and: |
- 10% (24/346) breastfed exclusively for a minimum of 6 months |
Breastfeeding / breast milk feeding clearly differentiated |
||
2002 |
- singleton vs. multiple pregnancy |
- 16% (55/346) breastfed exclusively for duration of their breast milk feeding |
Periodic reports re. proportion of expressing versus breastfeeding (at 1 day, 3 days, 2 weeks and monthly until 6 months) |
||
Random selection Postal recruitment when infants were between 2 and 3 years old |
- gestation at birth |
- 77% (182/236) expressed at some time in first 6 months |
Retrospective data, possible recall bias as participants were recruited 2 or more years post birth |
||
|
- breastfeeding outcomes |
- 59% (140/236 ) ceased breast milk feeding by 6 months |
|
||
|
|
Of the 140 women who had ceased breast milk feeding by 6 months, at the time point just prior to exclusive formula feeding: |
|
||
|
|
- 76% (106/140) were either expressing exclusively or combining expressing with breastfeeding |
|
||
|
|
- 24% (34/140) were breastfeeding |
|
||
|
|
Early breastfeeding associated with a longer duration of breast milk feeding |
|
||
Win et al. 2006 Australia [55] |
Prospective cohort |
Perth, Western Australia |
- Investigate association between breast milk expression and breastfeeding duration |
- Mothers who expressed at least once more likely to be breastfeeding at 6 months (RR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.52,0.98) |
Prospective design assisting recall |
PIFS II |
|
|
Ever “expressed” / “any” breastfeeding |
||
n = 587 |
|
|
? lower socio economic bias |
||
2002–03 |
|
|
No account of frequency of expressing |
||
Recruited in hospital at birth. |
|
|
|
||
Meehan et al. 2008 USA [43] |
Quasi-experimental |
Los Angeles, California |
- Evaluation of program to facilitate breastfeeding for low income mothers |
- Electric pump loan associated with more breastfeeding at 6 months. Mothers loaned a breast pump 5.5 times more likely to than those who hadn’t received one to not have requested formula by 6 months |
Limited reliability of proxy measurement to assess breast milk feeding prevalence or duration |
n = 208 |
- Maternal request for formula from WIC program used as proxy measurement to give indication of partial breastfeeding |
(OR: 5.5, 95% CI 2.0,15.1) |
No differentiation between breastfeeding and breast milk feeding |
||
2001 |
|
|
|
||
Breast pump loan program for low income Women with Children (WIC) recipients |
|
|
|
||
Fein 2008 USA [41] |
Prospective cohort |
National |
- Examine strategies used to combine work and breastfeeding |
Median duration of breast milk feeding associated with workplace practices: |
Large National study |
n = 810 |
- Identify strategies associated with enhanced breastfeeding intensity/longer duration |
|
Prospective design |
||
2005–2007 |
|
- expressing and breastfeeding (32.4 weeks) (n = 75) |
Questionnaire design with 7 day recall |
||
from IFPS II |
|
- breastfeed at the breast only (31.4 weeks) (n = 250) |
No description of feeding method away from workplace |
||
Recruitment via postal questionnaire in late pregnancy |
|
- expressing only (26.3 weeks) (n = 75) |
Older, less educated, low income and women from racial/ethnic minority groups underrepresented |
||
|
|
- neither breastfeeding or expressing (14.3 weeks) (n = 128) |
|
||
Clemons & Amir 2010 Australia [5] |
Cross-sectional |
State-wide, Victoria |
- Prevalence of breast milk expression |
- 27% (218/903) indicated that expressing had allowed them to breastfeed for longer |
Large study |
n = 903 |
- Demographic characteristics of women who express, why and how they do it |
|
Possible selection bias (members of ABA) |
||
2008 |
- Women’s experience of using breast pumps |
|
Timing of questionnaire, possible recall bias |
||
online questionnaire |
|
|
|
||
ABA members with internet addresses |
|
|
|
||
Dabritz et al. 2010 USA [56] |
Retrospective cohort |
Yolo County, California |
- Assess relationship between maternal experience in hospital and any breastfeeding at six months |
- Almost exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months associated with not using a breast pump in hospital 77% (93/121) compared to 21% (25/121) who did use a pump in hospital (OR: 0.6 95% CI 0.3,1.0) |
Differentiation between breastfeeding and breast milk feeding unclear |
n = 382 |
|
|
|
||
2006–07 |
|
|
Possible recall bias - interviews 6–9 months after birth |
||
Recruited in community after birth - 8 months |
|
|
|
||
Hornbeak et al. 2010 Singapore [6] |
Retrospective cohort |
Singapore |
- Record prevalence and patterns of breastfeeding in Singaporean Chinese mothers |
- Breast milk feeding initiation and duration increased over time and were independently associated with higher maternal education, increased milk expression and complementary feeding |
Large representative sample of Chinese Singaporean mothers |
n = 3009 |
|
Changes between 2000–01 and 2006–08: |
Possible recall bias - recruitment 6–72 months after birth |
||
2006–2008 |
|
Infant formula feeding 31% (66/210) to 18% (118/656) |
Gestational age not indicated |
||
Recruited mothers of 6–72 month Chinese Singaporean children through STARS |
|
Breast milk feed initiation 69% (144/210) to 82% (538/656) |
|
||
Mailed invitation |
|
Expressed breast milk 9% (18/210) to 18% (118/656) |
|
||
|
|
Combination feeding 26% (54/210) to 41% (269/656) |
|
||
Geraghty et al. 2012 USA [29] |
Prospective cohort |
Cincinnati, Ohio |
- Determine who expresses their milk by end of 4 weeks and how long they continue feeding |
- Milk expression common in first month postpartum |
Prospective design |
n = 60 |
|
- Milk expression by 4 weeks did not significantly influence duration of breast milk feeding |
Clear differentiation between breastfeeding and breast milk feeding |
||
2004–2007 |
|
|
Recruitment of women who planned to breastfeed for 6 months or more |
||
Participants enrolled in a research human milk bank recruited at home in first week postpartum |
|
|
Mothers recruited for study knew they were going to be assisted to pump and may have been more likely to be comfortable with this. |
||
Possible introduction of bias as weekly collection of breast milk was initiated at 1 week by research nurse using an electric breast pump |