Table 3.
Outcomes of mixed models analyses at baseline and post-intervention for all groups
| Effect | Contrast estimate | df (numerator, denominator) | F, t statistic a | P | Confidence intervals b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WSAS
| |||||
| Group x time: |
|
2, 764 |
9.225 |
.000 |
|
| Interaction contrasts: | |||||
| myCompass vs. ACc |
2.12 |
1, 802 |
3.23 |
.001 |
0.55-3.70 |
| myCompass vs. WL |
2.77 |
1, 792 |
4.18 |
.000 |
1.18-4.36 |
| AC vs. WL |
0.65 |
1, 711 |
0.28 |
.286 |
-0.81-2.10 |
|
DASS depression
| |||||
| Group x time |
|
2, 757 |
17.16 |
.000 |
|
| Interaction contrasts: | |||||
| myCompass vs. AC |
3.25 |
1, 794 |
4.27 |
.000 |
1.42-5.08 |
| myCompass vs. WL |
4.39 |
1, 779 |
5.72 |
.000 |
2.55-6.23 |
| AC vs. WL |
1.13 |
1, 709 |
1.59 |
.111 |
-0.57-2.83 |
|
DASS anxiety
| |||||
| Group x time |
|
2, 760 |
6.11 |
.002 |
|
| Interaction contrasts: | |||||
| myCompass vs. AC |
1.76 |
1, 796 |
2.93 |
.004 |
0.32-3.21 |
| myCompass vs. WL |
1.96 |
1, 782 |
3.25 |
.001 |
0.51-3.42 |
| AC vs. WL |
0.20 |
1, 711 |
0.36 |
.714 |
-1.13-1.54 |
|
DASS stress
| |||||
| Group x time |
|
2, 758 |
5.33 |
.005 |
|
| Interaction contrasts: | |||||
| myCompass vs. AC |
1.59 |
1, 795 |
2.25 |
.025 |
-0.11-3.29 |
| myCompass vs. WL |
2.29 |
1, 780 |
3.22 |
.001 |
0.50-4.00 |
| AC vs. WL |
0.71 |
1, 710 |
1.07 |
.283 |
-0.87-2.28 |
|
DASS total score
| |||||
| Group x time |
|
2, 758 |
13.065 |
.000 |
|
| Interaction contrasts: | |||||
| myCompass vs. AC |
6.83 |
1, 794 |
3.86 |
.000 |
2.59-11.97 |
| myCompass vs. WL |
8.79 |
1, 780 |
4.95 |
.000 |
4.53-13.05 |
| AC vs. WL | 1.95 | 1, 709 | 1.19 | .233 | -1.93-5.90 |
aAs appropriate.
bBonferroni adjusted confidence intervals, P = .016.
c= ‘Attention Control’, WL = ‘Waitlist’.