Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Offender Rehabil. 2012 May 16;51(4):222–238. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2011.641075

TABLE 2.

Results of Logistic Regression Analyses

Variables Entered prison Txa
Completed prison Txb
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Condition
 CO (referent group)
 C+T 2.19 .86–5.58 3.59** 1.54–8.37
 C+M 10.61c,*** 2.63–42.80 3.53** 1.51–8.27
Age 1.05 .99–1.12 1.07* 1.01–1.12
Age at first crime 1.02 .92–1.13 1.04 .96–1.13
Cocaine 30 1.01 .98–1.04 1.00 .97–1.02
Incarceration length 1.00 .99–1.00 1.00* 1.00–1.00
Drug treatment episodes 1.00 .89–1.13 .97 .87–1.09
Motivation scales
 Problem Recognition 93 .81–1.08 .97 .87–1.08
 Desire for Help .96 .76–1.22 1.08 .89–1.29
 Treatment Readiness .94 .81–1.08 .93 .83–1.04
 External Pressure .92 .79–1.07 .88* .78–.99

Note. OR=odds ratio; CO=counseling only; C+T=counseling plus transfer; C+M=counseling plus methadone.

a

χ2=24.25; df=11; p=.009.

b

χ2=26.30; df=11; p=.0001.

c

Entered prison treatment: **C+M vs. C+T.

*

p<.05.

**

p<.01.

***

p<.001.