TABLE 2.
Results of Logistic Regression Analyses
| Variables | Entered prison Txa
|
Completed prison Txb
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Condition | ||||
| CO (referent group) | ||||
| C+T | 2.19 | .86–5.58 | 3.59** | 1.54–8.37 |
| C+M | 10.61c,*** | 2.63–42.80 | 3.53** | 1.51–8.27 |
| Age | 1.05 | .99–1.12 | 1.07* | 1.01–1.12 |
| Age at first crime | 1.02 | .92–1.13 | 1.04 | .96–1.13 |
| Cocaine 30 | 1.01 | .98–1.04 | 1.00 | .97–1.02 |
| Incarceration length | 1.00 | .99–1.00 | 1.00* | 1.00–1.00 |
| Drug treatment episodes | 1.00 | .89–1.13 | .97 | .87–1.09 |
| Motivation scales | ||||
| Problem Recognition | 93 | .81–1.08 | .97 | .87–1.08 |
| Desire for Help | .96 | .76–1.22 | 1.08 | .89–1.29 |
| Treatment Readiness | .94 | .81–1.08 | .93 | .83–1.04 |
| External Pressure | .92 | .79–1.07 | .88* | .78–.99 |
Note. OR=odds ratio; CO=counseling only; C+T=counseling plus transfer; C+M=counseling plus methadone.
χ2=24.25; df=11; p=.009.
χ2=26.30; df=11; p=.0001.
Entered prison treatment: **C+M vs. C+T.
p<.05.
p<.01.
p<.001.