Table 3.
Association between total adiponectin and HOMA-IR
Outcome: in HOMA-IR |
Total adiponectin |
|
---|---|---|
B (95%CI) | p value | |
Model 1 |
|
|
ln Total adiponectin |
-0.331 (-0.421, -0.242) |
< 0.001 |
Ethnicity |
|
|
Aboriginal vs. European |
0.001 (-0.126, 0.125) |
0.995 |
Chinese vs. European |
0.061 (-0.052, 0.174) |
0.287 |
South Asian vs. European |
0.203 (0.087, 0.318) |
0.001 |
BMI |
0.054 (0.043, 0.064) |
< 0.001 |
WHR |
2.280 (1.530, 3.031) |
< 0.001 |
Model 2 |
|
|
ln Total adiponectin |
-0.300 (-0.385, -0.214) |
< 0.001 |
Ethnicity |
|
|
Aboriginal vs. European |
0.022 (-0.098, 0.141) |
0.722 |
Chinese vs. European |
0.061 (-0.046, 0.169) |
0.264 |
South Asian vs. European |
0.155 (0.044, 0.266) |
0.006 |
BMI |
0.030 (0.018, 0.041) |
< 0.001 |
WHR |
1.251 (0.488, 2.013) |
0.001 |
VAT | 0.473 (0.351, 0.594) | < 0.001 |
Outcome variable is ln HOMA-IR. Model 1 is adjusted for ethnicity, age, sex, family history of diabetes, formal level of education, BMI, WHR, smoking status, physical activity and energy intake. Model 2 = Model 1 + VAT.
BMI, body mass index; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.