Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 Mar 14;61(4):1471–1483. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.027

Figure 5. Reliability of ICA.

Figure 5

A. Salience network components identified using ICA with template-matching of a randomly selected subject's baseline (left) and follow up (right) scans (upper panel), and the group-level maps averaged from all subject's baseline and follow-up scans (lower panel). Individual maps are shown at z > 1.5. Group level maps are shown at p<0.01 uncorrected height and p<0.01 corrected extended thresholds B. Individual-level (of the same subject as in A; upper panel) and group-level (lower panel) salience network components identified using TCGICA, for baseline (left) and follow-up (right) scans. Maps are shown at z > 1.5. C. Map-wise ICCs using ICA with template-matching or TC-GICA for all subjects (black), mvmt<3 (gray) and mvmt<2 (light gray) groups. Number of subjects in each group is indicated in parentheses. ICA methods used are indicated along the x-axis. D. Average voxel-wise ICCs using ICA with template-matching or TC-GICA for all subjects (black), mvmt<3 (gray), and mvmt<2 (light gray) groups. Error bars signify s.e.m. across all voxels. Mean voxel-wise ICCs of voxels in the top 25th percentile for connectivity are shown as striped bars.