Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 8;11:239. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-239

Table 7.

Summary of all tests evaluated

Criteria Evaluated test Reference standard TP FP FN TN Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV LR+ LR- Prevalence Post-test + prevalence Post-test - prevalence
Symptoms
Kim et al. [24]
NCCP with atypical GERD symptoms
Endoscopy (LA classification) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4%, pH <4
3
20
5
6
0.38
0.23
0.13
0.55
0.49
2.71
24
13
45
Kim et al. [24]
NCCP with typical GERD symptoms
Endoscopy (LA classification) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4%, pH <4
11
2
5
6
0.69
0.75
0.85
0.55
2.75
0.42
67
85
45
Mousavi et al. [27]
NCCP with typical GERD symptoms
GERD if two tests positive: endoscopy (Hentzel-Dent), Bernstein test, omeprazole trial
11
5
24
38
0.31
0.88
0.69
0.61
2.70
0.78
45
69
39
Mousavi et al. [27]
NCCP relieved by antacid
GERD if two tests positive: endoscopy (Hentzel-Dent), Bernstein test, omeprazole trial
15
36
20
7
0.43
0.16
0.68
0.64
0.51
3.51
45
29
74
Mousavi et al. [27]
NCCP and heartburn in history
GERD if two tests positive: endoscopy (Hentzel-Dent), Bernstein test, omeprazole trial
14
8
21
35
0.40
0.81
0.64
0.63
2.15
0.74
45
64
38
Mousavi et al. [27]
NCCP and regurgitation in history
GERD if two tests positive: endoscopy (Hentzel-Dent), Bernstein test, omeprazole trial
17
7
18
36
0.49
0.84
0.71
0.67
2.98
0.61
45
71
33
Hong et al. [25]
NCCP
Manometry (Specler 2001 criteria) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4% pH <4)
72
114
128
148
0.36
0.56
0.39
0.54
0.83
1.13
43
39
46
Hong et al. [25]
Control: dysphagia
Manometry (Specler 2001 criteria) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4% pH <4)
27
26
181
228
0.13
0.90
0.51
0.56
1.27
0.97
45
51
44
Hong et al. [25]
Control: GERD-typical symptoms
Manometry (Specler 2001 criteria) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4% pH <4)
53
53
151
205
0.26
0.79
0.50
0.58
1.26
0.93
44
50
42
Hong et al. [25]
Dysphagia
Manometry
16
37
84
325
0.16
0.90
0.30
0.80
1.57
0.94
22
30
21
Hong et al. [25]
Dysphagia
24 h pH-metry
4
49
63
346
0.06
0.88
0.08
0.85
0.48
1.07
15
8
15
Hong et al. [25]
Dysphagia
Manometry and 24 h pH-metry
7
46
23
386
0.23
0.89
0.13
0.94
2.19
0.86
7
13
6
Hong et al. [25]
NCCP
Manometry
34
152
63
213
0.35
0.58
0.18
0.77
0.84
1.11
21
18
23
Hong et al. [25]
NCCP
24 h pH-metry
29
157
43
233
0.40
0.60
0.16
0.60
1.00
1.00
16
16
16
Hong et al. [25]
NCCP
Manometry and 24 h pH-metry
9
177
22
254
0.29
0.59
0.05
0.92
0.71
1.20
7
5
8
Hong et al. [25]
GERD-typical symptoms
Manometry
19
87
81
275
0.19
0.76
0.18
0.77
0.79
1.07
22
18
23
Hong et al. [25]
GERD-typical symptoms
24 h pH-metry
23
83
49
307
0.32
0.79
0.22
0.86
1.50
0.86
16
22
14
Hong et al. [25]
GERD-typical symptoms
Manometry and 24 h pH-metry
11
95
20
336
0.35
0.78
0.10
0.94
1.61
0.83
7
10
6
Netzer et al. [26]
NCCP
Manometry and/or 24 h pH-metry (>10.5% pH <4)
31
14
223
35
0.12
0.71
0.69
0.14
0.43
1.23
84
69
86
Netzer et al. [26]
Control: GERD-typical symptoms
Manometry and/or 24 h pH-metry (>10.5% pH <4)
127
16
127
33
0.50
0.67
0.89
0.21
1.53
0.74
84
89
79
Netzer et al. [26]
Control: dysphagia
Manometry and/or 24 h pH-metry (>10.5% pH <4)
48
8
206
41
0.19
0.84
0.86
0.17
1.16
0.97
84
86
83
Netzer et al. [26]
GERD-typical symptoms
24 h pH-metry
115
28
49
111
0.70
0.80
0.80
0.69
3.48
0.37
54
80
31
Netzer et al. [26]
Dysphagia
24 h pH-metry
6
50
158
89
0.04
0.64
0.11
0.36
0.10
1.50
54
11
64
Netzer et al. [26]
NCCP
24 h pH-metry
24
21
140
118
0.15
0.85
0.53
0.46
0.97
1.01
54
53
54
PPI trial
Dickman et al. [31]
Rabeprazole 20 mg twice a day for 1 week SIS ≥50%
Endoscopy (Hentzel-Dent grades) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4.2% pH <4)
12
2
4
17
0.75
0.89
0.86
0.81
7.13
0.28
46
86
19
Dickman et al. [31]
Placebo for 1 week
Endoscopy (Hentzel-Dent grades) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4.2% pH <4)
3
4
13
15
0.19
0.79
0.43
0.54
0.89
1.03
46
43
46
Bautista et al. [32]
Lansoprazole 60 mg AM, 30 mg PM for 1 week SIS ≥50%
Endoscopy (Hentzel-Dent grades) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4.2% pH <4)
14
2
4
20
0.78
0.91
0.875
0.833
8.56
0.24
45
88
17
Bautista et al. [32]
Lansoprazole 60 mg AM, 30 mg PM for 1 week SIS ≥65%
Endoscopy (Hentzel-Dent grades) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4.2% pH <4)
15
1
3
21
0.83
0.95
0.93
0.88
18.33
0.17
45
94
13
Bautista et al. [32]
Placebo for 1 week
Endoscopy (Hentzel-Dent grades) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4.2% pH <4)
4
8
14
14
0.22
0.64
0.33
0.50
0.61
1.22
45
33
50
Fass et al. [33]
Omeprazole 40 mg AM, 20 mg PM for 1 week SIS ≥50%
Endoscopy (Hentzel-Dent grades) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4.2% pH <4)
18
2
5
12
0.78
0.86
0.90
0.71
5.48
0.25
62
90
29
Fass et al. [33]
Placebo for 1 week
Endoscopy (Hentzel-Dent grades) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4.2% pH <4)
5
1
18
13
0.22
0.93
0.83
0.42
3.04
0.84
62
83
58
Pandak et al. [34]
Omeprazole 40 mg twice a day for 2 weeks SIS ≥50%
Endoscopy and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4.2% pH <4)
18
6
2
12
0.90
0.67
0.75
0.86
2.70
0.15
53
75
14
Pandak et al. [34]
Placebo for 2 weeks SIS ≥50%
Endoscopy and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4.2% pH <4)
1
3
19
15
0.05
0.83
0.25
0.44
0.30
1.14
53
25
56
Kim et al. [35]
NCCP GERD-related (TP) vs NCCP non-GERD-related (TN): rabeprazole for 1 week SIS ≥50%
Endoscopy (LA classification) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4.0 pH <4)
8
6
8
20
0.50
0.77
0.57
0.71
2.17
0.65
38
57
29
Kim et al. [35]
NCCP GERD-related (TP) vs NCCP non-GERD-related (TN): rabeprazole for 2 weeks SIS ≥50%
Endoscopy (LA classification) and/or 24 h pH-metry (>4.0 pH <4)
13
7
3
19
0.81
0.73
0.65
0.86
3.02
0.26
38
65
14
Xia et al. [36]
Lansoprazole 30 mg once a day for 4 weeks SIS ≥50%
24 h pH-metry (De Meester pH <4, 7.5 s)
11
8
1
16
0.92
0.67
0.58
0.94
2.75
0.13
33
58
6
Xia et al. [36]
Placebo for 4 weeks SIS ≥50%
24 h pH-metry (De Meester pH <4, 7.5 s)
4
7
8
13
0.33
0.65
0.36
0.62
0.95
1.03
38
36
38
Kushnir et al. [37]
High-degree response on PPI (not specified)
24 pH-metry (≥4%, pH <4)
40
18
12
28
0.77
0.61
0.69
0.70
1.97
0.38
53
69
30
Kushnir et al. [37]
High-degree response on PPI
Positive Ghillibert probability estimate (GPE)
21
37
5
35
0.81
0.49
0.36
0.88
1.57
0.40
27
36
12
Kushnir et al. [37]
High-degree response on PPI
Association of chest pain with pH <4 in reference standard: SI ≥50%
19
39
6
34
0.76
0.47
0.33
0.85
1.42
0.52
26
33
15
Kushnir et al. [37]
High-degree response on PPI
24 h pH-metry and positive GPE
15
43
2
38
0.88
0.47
0.26
0.95
1.66
0.25
17
26
5
Kushnir et al. [37]
High-degree response on PPI
24 h pH-metry and SI ≥50%
16
42
2
38
0.89
0.48
0.28
0.95
1.69
0.23
18
28
5
Kushnir et al. [37]
High-degree response on PPI
24 h pH-metry and SI ≥50% and positive GPE
14
44
1
39
0.93
0.47
0.24
0.98
1.76
0.14
15
24
2
Symptom index
Singh et al. [28]
Association of chest pain with pH <4 in reference standard: SI ≥50%
Endoscopy and/or 24 h pH-metry (De Meester >5.5% pH <4)
19
38
15
81
0.56
0.68
0.33
0.84
1.75
0.65
22
33
16
Singh et al. [28]
Association of chest pain with pH <4 in reference standard: SI ≥25%
Endoscopy and/or 24 h pH-metry (De Meester >5.5% pH <4)
23
59
11
60
0.68
0.50
0.28
0.85
1.36
0.64
22
28
15
Singh et al. [28]
Association of chest pain with pH <4 in reference standard: SI ≥75%
Endoscopy and/or 24 h pH-metry (De Meester >5.5% pH <4)
8
5
26
114
0.24
0.96
0.62
0.81
5.60
0.80
22
62
19
Singh et al. [28]
Association of heartburn with pH <4 in reference standard: Symptom Index (SI) ≥50%
Endoscopy and/or 24 h pH-metry (De Meester >5.5% pH <4)
40
32
3
78
0.93
0.71
0.56
0.96
3.20
0.10
28
56
4
Singh et al. [28]
Association of heartburn with pH <4 in reference standard: SI ≥25%
Endoscopy and/or 24 h pH-metry (De Meester >5.5% pH <4)
41
40
2
70
0.95
0.64
0.51
0.97
2.62
0.07
28
51
3
Singh et al. [28]
Association of heartburn with pH <4 in reference standard: SI ≥75%
Endoscopy and/or 24 h pH-metry (De Meester >5.5% pH <4)
25
25
9
94
0.74
0.79
0.50
0.91
3.50
0.34
28
58
12
Ho et al. [29]
Association of chest pain with pH <4 in reference standard: SI >50%
24 h pH-metry (>4% pH <4, 4 s)
3
9
11
38
0.21
0.81
0.25
0.78
1.12
0.97
23
25
22
Lam et al. [30]
Association of chest pain with pH <4 in reference standard: SI ≥75%
24 h pH-metry (execution in acute stage)
13
0
15
13
0.46
1.00
1.00
0.48
13.03
0.54
68
97
54
Others
Lacima et al. [38]
24 h-manometry (pH <4)
Manometry during hospital stay
18
24
18
30
0.50
0.56
0.43
0.56
1.13
0.90
40
43
38
Provocation test
Cooke et al. [39]
NCCP during exertional pH-metry
24 h pH-metry (5.5% pH <4 for 10 s)
4
0
15
31
0.21
1.00
1.00
0.67
14.40
0.79
38
90
33
Cooke et al. [39]
Control group: CVD with angina: exertional pH-metry
24 h pH-metry (5.5% pH <4 for 10 s)
1
1
2
12
0.33
0.92
0.50
0.86
4.33
0.72
19
50
14
Bovero et al. [40]
NCCP with normal ECG during exertional pH-metry
24 h pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4))
17
1
29
20
0.37
0.95
0.94
0.41
7.76
0.66
69
94
59
Bovero et al. [40]
NCCP at rest: NCCP with normal ECG during exertional pH-metry
24 h pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4))
11
1
23
11
0.32
0.92
0.92
0.32
3.88
0.74
74
92
68
Bovero et al. [40]
NCCP exertion/mixed: NCCP with normal ECG during exertional pH-metry
24 h pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4))
6
0
6
9
0.50
1.00
1.00
0.60
10.00
0.50
57
93
40
Bovero et al. [40]
24 h pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4))
NCCP with normal ECG during exertional pH-metry
17
29
1
20
0.94
0.41
0.37
0.95
1.60
0.14
27
37
5
Bovero et al. [40]
24 h pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4))
NCCP at rest: NCCP with normal ECG during exertional pH-metry
11
23
1
11
0.92
0.32
0.32
0.92
1.36
0.26
26
32
8
Romand et al. [41]
NCCP: pH <4 for 10 s during exertional pH-metry
24 h pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4))
7
14
3
19
0.70
0.58
0.33
0.86
1.65
0.52
23
33
14
Abrahao et al. [42]
NCCP reproducible during balloon distension
Endoscopy (Savary-Miller) and/or manometry and/or pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4
14
1
21
4
0.40
0.80
0.93
0.16
2.00
0.75
88
93
84
Abrahao et al. [42]
NCCP reproducible during Tensilon test
Endoscopy (Savary-Miller) and/or manometry and/or pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4
6
2
29
3
0.17
0.60
0.75
0.09
0.43
1.38
88
75
91
Abrahao et al. [42]
NCCP reproducible during Bernstein test
Endoscopy (Savary-Miller) and/or manometry and/or pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4
9
1
26
4
0.26
0.80
0.90
0.13
1.29
0.93
88
90
87
Abrahao et al. [42]
Tensilon and Bernstein Test and balloon distension (+ if 1 test +)
Endoscopy (Savary-Miller) and/or manometry and/or pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4
20
3
15
2
0.57
0.40
0.87
0.12
0.95
1.07
88
87
88
Abrahao et al. [42]
NCCP reproducible during Tensilon test
Endoscopy (Savary-Miller) and/or pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4
6
2
26
6
0.19
0.75
0.75
0.19
0.75
1.08
80
75
81
Abrahao et al. [42]
NCCP reproducible during Bernstein test
Endoscopy (Savary-Miller) and/or pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4
8
2
24
6
0.25
0.75
0.80
0.20
1.00
1.00
80
80
80
Abrahao et al. [42]
NCCP reproducible during balloon distension
Endoscopy (Savary-Miller) and/or pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4
13
2
19
6
0.41
0.75
0.87
0.24
1.63
0.79
80
87
76
Abrahao et al. [42]
Tensilon and Bernstein Test and balloon distension (+ if 1 test +)
Endoscopy (Savary-Miller) and/or pH-metry (De Meester criteria: >4.5% pH <4
18
5
14
3
0.56
0.38
0.78
0.18
0.90
1.17
80
78
82
Ho et al. [29]
NCCP reproducible during Bernstein test
Endoscopy
4
7
3
56
0.57
0.89
0.36
0.95
5.14
0.48
10
36
5
Eosinophilia
Achem et al. [43]
Current GERD symptoms
Esophageal biopsies
10
26
14
121
0.42
0.82
0.28
0.90
2.36
0.71
14
28
10
Achem et al. [43]
Male gender or current GERD symptoms
Esophageal biopsies
18
69
6
78
0.75
0.53
0.21
0.93
1.60
0.47
14
21
7
Achem et al. [43]
Male gender or any abnormal EoE endoscopic finding
Esophageal biopsies
23
79
1
68
0.96
0.46
0.23
0.99
1.78
0.09
14
23
1
Achem et al. [43]
Current GERD symptoms or any abnormal EoE endoscopic finding
Esophageal biopsies
20
63
4
84
0.83
0.57
0.24
0.96
1.94
0.29
14
24
5
Musculoskeletal
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Biomechanical dysfunction
Standardized examination protocol
112
120
0
70
1.00
0.37
0.48
1.00
1.58
0.00
37
48
0
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
≥3 of 5 overall palpation findings
Standardized examination protocol
111
124
1
66
0.99
0.35
0.47
0.99
1.52
0.03
37
47
1
Bosner et al. [45]
Chest wall symptom (CWS) score: localized muscle tension, stinging pain, pain reproducible by palpation, absence of cough, cut-off test negative 0 to 1 points
Interdisciplinary consensus: cardiologist, GP, research associate (based on reviewed baseline, follow-up data)
506
318
59
329
0.90
0.51
0.66
0.82
1.82
0.20
47
61
15
Bosner et al. [45]
CWS score: localized muscle tension, stinging pain, pain reproducible by palpation, absence of cough, cut-off test negative 0 to 2 points
Interdisciplinary consensus
357
135
208
512
0.63
0.79
0.76
0.67
3.02
0.47
47
72
29
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Anterior chest wall tenderness
Standardized examination protocol
110
134
2
56
0.98
0.29
0.45
0.97
1.39
0.06
37
45
3
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Angina pectoris (uncertain or negative)
Standardized examination protocol
109
147
3
43
0.97
0.23
0.43
0.94
1.26
0.12
37
43
7
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Pain worse on movement of torso
Standardized examination protocol
32
16
80
174
0.29
0.92
0.67
0.69
3.39
0.78
37
67
32
Bosner et al. [45]
Pain worse with movement
Interdisciplinary consensus
221
119
344
528
0.39
0.82
0.65
0.61
2.13
0.75
47
65
40
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Positive/possible belief in pain origin from muscle/joints
Standardized examination protocol
108
156
4
34
0.96
0.18
0.41
0.90
1.17
0.20
37
41
11
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Pain relief on pain medication
Standardized examination protocol
25
13
87
177
0.22
0.93
0.66
0.67
3.26
0.83
37
66
33
Bosner et al. [45]
Pain reproducible by palpation
Interdisciplinary consensus
351
193
214
454
0.62
0.70
0.68
0.64
2.08
0.54
47
65
32
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Paraspinal tenderness
Standardized examination protocol
90
112
22
78
0.80
0.41
0.45
0.78
1.36
0.48
37
45
22
Bosner et al. [45]
Localized muscle tension
Interdisciplinary consensus
346
164
219
483
0.61
0.75
0.71
0.66
2.41
0.52
47
68
32
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Chest pain present now
Standardized examination protocol
92
116
20
74
0.82
0.39
0.44
0.79
1.35
0.46
37
44
21
Bosner et al. [45]
Pain now
Interdisciplinary consensus
328
327
237
320
0.58
0.49
0.50
0.57
1.15
0.85
47
50
43
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Pain debut not during a meal
Standardized examination protocol
109
168
3
22
0.97
0.12
0.39
0.88
1.10
0.23
37
39
12
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Sharp pain
Standardized examination protocol
39
35
73
155
0.35
0.82
0.53
0.68
1.89
0.80
37
53
32
Bosner et al. [45]
Stinging pain
Interdisciplinary consensus
299
184
266
463
0.53
0.72
0.62
0.63
1.87
0.66
47
62
37
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Hard physical exercise at least once a week
Standardized examination protocol
42
60
70
130
0.38
0.68
0.41
0.65
1.19
0.91
37
41
35
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Pain not provoked during a meal
Standardized examination protocol
109
170
3
20
0.97
0.11
0.39
0.87
1.09
0.25
37
39
13
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Not sudden debut
Standardized examination protocol
53
31
59
159
0.47
0.84
0.63
0.73
2.90
0.63
37
63
27
Bosner et al. [45]
Pain >24 h
Interdisciplinary consensus
158
139
407
508
0.28
0.79
0.53
0.56
1.30
0.92
47
54
45
Stochkendahl et al. [44]
Age ≤49 years old
Standardized examination protocol
67
54
45
136
0.60
0.72
0.55
0.75
2.10
0.56
37
55
25
Bosner et al. [45]
Pain mostly at noon time
Interdisciplinary consensus
13
30
552
617
0.02
0.95
0.31
0.53
0.50
1.02
47
31
48
Bosner et al. [45]
Cough
Interdisciplinary consensus
31
129
534
518
0.06
0.80
0.19
0.49
0.28
1.18
47
20
51
Bosner et al. [45]
Known IHD
Interdisciplinary consensus
56
122
509
525
0.10
0.81
0.32
0.51
0.52
1.11
47
32
50
Bosner et al. [45]
Pain worse with breathing
Interdisciplinary consensus
138
123
427
524
0.24
0.81
0.53
0.55
1.28
0.93
47
53
45
Manchikanti et al. [46]
Chronic thoracic pain: lidocaine injection
Bupivacaine injection
22
14
_
_
 
 
0.61
_
 
 
 
 
 
Psychiatric
Kuijpers et al. [47]
Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A score, cut-off ≥8)
Diagnosis Anxiety disorders (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (gold standard))
195
71
3
75
0.98
0.51
0.73
0.96
2.03
0.03
58
73
4
Demiryoguran et al. [48]
Palpitation
Anxiety disorder: HADS-A score (cut-off ≥10)
18
25
31
80
0.37
0.76
0.42
0.72
1.54
0.83
31
41
27
Demiryoguran et al. [48]
Fear of dying
Anxiety disorder: HADS-A score (cut-off ≥10)
11
6
38
102
0.22
0.94
0.65
0.73
4.04
0.82
31
65
27
Demiryoguran et al. [48]
Light-headedness, dizziness, faintness
Anxiety disorder: HADS-A score (cut-off ≥10)
11
8
38
100
0.22
0.93
0.58
0.73
3.03
0.84
31
58
28
Demiryoguran et al. [48]
Chills or hot flushes
Anxiety disorder: HADS-A score (cut-off ≥10)
11
5
38
103
0.22
0.95
0.69
0.73
4.85
0.81
31
69
27
Demiryoguran et al. [48]
Shortness of breath
Anxiety disorder: HADS-A score (cut-off ≥10)
13
22
36
86
0.27
0.80
0.37
0.71
1.30
0.92
31
37
29
Demiryoguran et al. [48]
Nausea or gastric discomfort
Anxiety disorder: HADS-A score (cut-off ≥10)
9
10
40
98
0.18
0.91
0.47
0.71
1.98
0.90
31
47
29
Demiryoguran et al. [48]
Diaphoresis
Anxiety disorder: HADS-A score (cut-off ≥10)
19
12
30
96
0.39
0.89
0.61
0.76
3.49
0.69
31
61
24
Foldes-Busque et al. [49]
The Panic Screening Score (derivation population)
Panic disorder diagnosis (structured Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition DSM-IV (ADIS-IV))
53
19
31
98
0.63
0.84
0.74
0.76
3.89
0.44
42
74
24
Foldes-Busque et al. [49]
The Panic Screening Score (validation population)
Panic disorder diagnosis (structured ADIS-IV)
69
27
61
148
0.53
0.85
0.72
0.71
3.44
0.55
43
72
29
Katerndahl et al. [51]
GP diagnosis of panic disorder
Panic disorder (structured clinical Interview of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, based on DSM-III-R)
2
2
26
21
0.07
0.91
0.50
0.45
0.82
1.02
55
50
55
Fleet et al. [50] Panic disorder diagnosis: formula including Agoraphobia Cognitions QA, Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia, Zone 12 Dermatome Pain Map, Sensory McGill Pain QA, Gender, Zone 25 (Validation population) Panic Disorder (ADIS-R structured interview by psychologist) 32 41 17 122 0.65 0.75 0.44 0.88 2.60 0.46 23 44 12