Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Sep 1;65(9):1088–1099. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300229

Table 2.

LC Components Highlighted for Comparison*

Study Information LC Components QI Processes Organizational Involvement
As this review is focused on
the state of the extant
literature, this category
highlights the basic study
details highlighted by the
published article
Given the definition of LCs compiled from
a review of the literature, which common
LC components were explicitly referenced
by study authors
Beyond the basic
components of the LC, which
quality improvement
techniques were included?
In theory, LCs enable an
organization to enact change at
multiple levels within their
organizational structure; Did the
LC take steps to train or
otherwise involve members of
the organization who were not
directly included in the
collaborative?
Target for Improvement
What was the focus of the
LC?
Length of Collaborative
Can a standard collaborative length be
established?
Sites Collected New Data for
QI
During the collaborative, did
sites collect new data for
quality improvement
purposes?
Leadership
Involvement/Outreach
Did members of the
collaborative involve or
otherwise reach out to local
leadership?
Model(s)
Did the LC align with existing
collaborative models?
Pre-Work: Convened Expert Panel
The BTS model calls for a planning group
that identifies targets for improvement
change and plans the collaborative
Sites Reviewed Data & Used
Feedback
Did the collaborative sites
review new data and adjust
their practices according to
findings?
Training for ‘Non-QI Team Staff
Members’ by Experts
Did LC faculty or other experts
provide training for staff
members who were not a part of
the QI Team?
Study Sample
What was the population of
focus?
Pre-Work:Organizations Required to
Demonstrate Commitment
The BTS model recommends requiring
formal commitments, application
criteria, or “readiness” activities for LC
sites.
External Support with Data
Synthesis & Feedback
Did LC faculty or other
experts provide support with
data synthesis and feedback?
Training for ‘Non-QI Team Staff
Members’ by the QI Team
After the collaborative, did
newly trained QI team members
provide training for staff
members who were not a part of
the QI Team?
In-Person Learning Sessions
Teams are traditionally trained in clinical
approaches and QI approaches during
initial in-person sessions
PDSAs
Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles are a
key component of the rapid cycle
approach to change recommended by
the BTS model
Multidisciplinary QI Team
LCs typically involve staff members at
various levels of the organization
QI Team Calls
Calls among QI team members or
between members in other participating
organizations are a common component
Email or Web Support
Email, listservs, or other forms of web
support have become a common
approach for providing ongoing support
*

Adapted from: Understanding the Components of Quality Improvement Collaboratives: A Systematic Literature Review. Nadeem, E., Olin, S. S., Hill, L. C., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horowitz, S. M. (2013). The Milbank Quarterly, 91, 354–394.