Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2013 Dec 18;62(3):1221–1231. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2013.2295615

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Comparison of imaging a Class II (scattered fibroglandular) numerical breast phantom using two types of antenna arrays. Coronal (top row) and sagittal (bottom row) cross-sections of relative permittivity at 2.0 GHz. (a)–(b) Actual profile. (c)–(d) Images reconstructed from simulated data acquired using an enclosed array of RS patch antennas. (e)–(f) Images reconstructed from simulated data acquired using an enclosed array of RS+CS+NRS patch antennas.