Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 10;9(11):e112292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112292

Figure 3. FRET between streptavidin on plastic plates and IEkMCC tethered with PEG polymers.

Figure 3

(A) Measured FRET efficiencies of IEkMCC tethered with six different PEG polymers. The intensity of DyLight 549 was captured before and after DyLight 649 was photobleached. The measured FRET efficiency (Inline graphic) was calculated using the intensity of DyLight 549 before (Inline graphic) and after (Inline graphic) DyLight 649 photobleaching (Inline graphic ). The averaged values of two measurements were plotted with standard deviations. (B) After normalization, the measured FRET efficiencies match those calculated based on the Flory radius (Inline graphic) of the PEG polymers. The Inline graphic of the PEG polymer of Inline graphicsubunits and unit length Inline graphic was calculated using Inline graphic, where Inline graphic is 0.28 nm [32]. Theoretical FRET efficiency (Inline graphic) was calculated using the equation Inline graphic, where the Förster distance (Inline graphic) of the DyLight 549-DyLight 649 donor-acceptor pair is 5 nm and the distance between the pMHC ligand and streptavidin Inline graphic is Inline graphic of the PEG polymer plus the pMHC radius of 2 nm. The FRET efficiencies were normalized by dividing the FRET efficiencies by the FRET efficiency of PEG 88.