Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 10;9(11):e112560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112560

Table 3. Results of Tukey-Kramer Honest Significant Difference test of all Phase 1 results°.

Overlap Joint Class byAdhesive Loading Agentand Substrate Condition Group A Group B Group C Group D Group E Group F Mean AdhesiveFracture Energy(Joules/Meter2) # OverlapJoints (n)
Silicon Dioxide - Rough Substrate A 39.89 5
GRD-Natural Yellow - Rough Substrate A B 30.61 5
GRD-548 - Rough Substrate B 27.59 5
PT Primer-NaturalRed - Rough Substrate B 26.54 5
Gum Arabic Only - RoughSubstrate B 26.36 5
Coarse Specularite - RoughSubstrate B C 23.93 6
P3-Natural Red - RoughSubstrate B C D 21.27 5
Gum Arabic Only - SmoothSubstrate C D 17.07 15
PT Primer-Natural Red -Smooth Substrate D 15.39 15
Coarse Specularite - SmoothSubstrate D 15.03 14
GRD-548 - SmoothSubstrate D E 14.09 14
GRD-Natural Yellow -Smooth Substrate E F 8.30 13
Silicon Dioxide - SmoothSubstrate F 7.79 16
P3-Natural Red - SmoothSubstrate F 6.54 15

°Classes not connected by the same letter are significantly different. q* = 3.421, α = 0.05, N = 138.