Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 10;9(11):e112560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112560

Table 5. Spearman’s rank correlation of particle size and Adhesive Fracture Energy for Phase 2 results§.

Particle Size Class Spearman ρ for Correlation of %Particle Size Class with AdhesiveFracture Energy for SmoothOverlap Joints Probability >|ρ|for SmoothOverlap Joints(n = 119) Spearman ρ for Correlation of %Particle Size Class with AdhesiveFracture Energy for RoughenedOverlap Joints Probability >|ρ|for RoughOverlap Joints(n = 79)
% CoarseSand −0.1847 0.0443 −0.4583 <.0001
% MediumSand −0.1705 0.0637 −0.3924 0.0003
% FineSand −0.1033 0.2634 0.0191 0.8675
% VeryFine Sand −0.0390 0.6738 0.3548 0.0013
% Silt andClay 0.1067 0.2480 0.6658 <.0001
§

Correlations calculated separately for roughened and smooth joints. Gum arabic only control joints (n = 10) were excluded from the calculations.