Table 1.
Comparison of chicken CNVRs identified in this study and in previous studies using 385 K NimbleGen whole genome-tiling arrays
| Study | Chicken CNVRs identified in this study and in previous studies | Overlaps with this study | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform | Samples | Breeds/Species | CNVR | Range (kb) | Median (kb) | Mean (kb) | Total length (Mb) | Count* | Percentage | Total length (kb) | Percentage | |
| Griffin et al. [34] | 385 k NimbleGen | 2 | 2 | 21 | 18.77–900.00 | 90.00 | 141.83 | 2.84 | 6 | 2.14 | 418.06 | 3.27 |
| Völker et al. [29] | 385 k NimbleGen | 1 | 2 | 27 | 20.15–950.00 | 127.10 | 211.77 | 5.29 | 3 | 1.07 | 710.00 | 5.55 |
| Wang et al. [32] | 385 k NimbleGen | 10 | 3 | 91 | 10.30–2030.06 | 42.59 | 157.17 | 15.72 | 14 | 4.98 | 814.91 | 6.37 |
| Wang et al. [31] | 400 k Agilent | 6 | 3 | 130 | 6.20–649.12 | 14.43 | 25.70 | 3.34 | 12 | 4.27 | 339.79 | 2.65 |
| Tian et al. [28] | 400 k Agilent | 22 | 11 | 308 | 5.82 –2025.34 | 14.6 | 35.1 | 10.8 | 29 | 10.32 | 818.53 | 6.39 |
| Crooijmans et al. [33] | Agilent244K | 64 | 15 | 1556 | 4.87-4365.80 | 26.0 | 45.2 | 70.1 | 50 | 17.79 | 2151.12 | 16.81 |
| This study | 385 k NimbleGen | 10 | 5 | 281 | 9.63–1522.58 | 25.0 | 45.6 | 12.8 | — | — | — | — |
*:The number of CNVRs identified in the present study that have been previously reported.