Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 26;14:203. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-203

Table 5.

Comparison of 2-hPG, FPG and HbAlc between the sham taVNS and no-treatment control groups

    P-value Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI
2hPG
Crude
<.001
8.63
9.336
Adjusted
.003
8.636
9.294
FPG
Crude
.055
6.293
6.603
Adjusted
.3
6.294
6.587
HbAlc Crude
.018
6.051
6.285
Adjusted .07 6.052 6.247

Adjusted values reflect age, gender, and BMI as covariates.