Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 9;14:501. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-501

Table 4.

Joint effects and interactions of HPV16 L1 seropositivity and genotypes at susceptibility loci on the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in cases and controls

HPV16 status
Susceptibility Loci
Cases (n = 313)
Controls (n = 314)
Adjusted P values
Adjusted OR (95% CI) *
    No. % No. %    
 
Rrs738722
 
 
 
 
 
 
Negative
CC (Ref.)
70
22.4
106
33.8
 
1.00
Negative
TT + CT
73
23.3
72
22.9
0.112
1.45 (0.92-2.30)
Positive
CC
99
31.6
81
25.8
0.002
2.00 (1.29-3.10)
Positive
TT + CT
71
22.7
55
17.5
0.003
2.09 (1.29-3.38)
 
G*HPV16
 
 
 
 
0.068
1.223 (0.99-1.52)
 
rsrs2074356
 
 
 
 
 
 
Negative
CC (Ref.)
87
27.8
128
40.8
 
1.00
Negative
TT + TC
56
17.9
50
15.9
0.054
1.61 (0.99-2.62)
Positive
CC
109
33.9
99
31.5
0.005
1.78 (1.19-2.66)
Positive
TT + TC
61
19.5
37
11.8
<0.001
2.66 (1.59-4.46)
 
G*HPV16
 
 
 
 
0.005
1.40 (1.11-1.77)
 
rsrs2274223
 
 
 
 
 
 
Negative
AA (Ref.)
82
26.2
118
37.6
 
1.00
Negative
GG + AG
61
19.5
60
19.1
0.055
1.59 (0.99-2.55)
Positive
AA
90
28.8
91
29.0
0.042
1.55 (1.02-2.37)
Positive
GG + AG
80
25.6
45
14.3
<0.001
3.17 (1.94-5.17)
  GG*HPV16         <0.001 1.53 (1.23-1.91)

*ORs were adjusted for age, sex, smoking and drinking in logistic regression models.

P values for gene*HPV16 interaction were calculated by conducting a 1-degree-of-freedom parameter (SNP*HPV16) as implemented in unconditional logistic regression with age, sex, smoking and drinking as covariates (22).