Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 8;16(1):R74. doi: 10.1186/bcr3689

Table 1.

Differences in study design, experimental approaches and sample characteristics a

Study demographics PVLSI SHL b [12] UICH b [24] PBCS cancer-adjacent normal tissue PBCS tumor tissue
Cancer status
Cancer-free
Cancer-free
Cancer-free
Breast cancer
Breast cancer
Tissue source
Fresh whole tissue
Core needle biopsies
Microdissected FFPE tissue
Fresh whole tissue
Fresh whole tissue
Tissue enrichment
Stroma
Epithelial and stromal
Epithelial
Stroma
Epithelial
Gene expression platform
Agilent 4 × 44K
GeneChip U133Plus 2.0
RT-PCR of 64 genes
Agilent 4 × 44K
Illumina
Samples
 
 
 
 
  Total
130
107
24
150
  ER+, n (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
117 (78%)
  Parous, n (%)
76 (58%)
67 (63%)
11 (46%)
119 (79%)
  Premenopausal, n (%)
84 (65%)
0 (0%)
24 (100%)
41 (27%)
Mean age (±SD), yr
37 (13)
60 (5)
29 (6)
56 (10)
Mean BMI (±SD) 30c (6) 25 (4) 28 (5)

a%, Percentage for categorical variables; BMI, Body mass index; FFPE, Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded; N/A, Not applicable; PBCS, Polish Breast Cancer Case–Control Study; PVLSI, Samples obtained from normal breast tissue of 130 women who underwent reduction mammoplasty surgery at Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, MA, USA, and banked at the Pioneer Valley Life Sciences Institute; SD, Standard deviation for continuous variables; SHL, Normal breast samples from 107 postmenopausal healthy volunteers recruited at the Sunderby Hospital in Luleå, Sweden; UICH, Mammoplasty benign biopsy specimens from 24 premenopausal women from the University of Illinois at Chicago Hospital. bFrom previously published, parity-related gene expression signatures in healthy women [12,24]. cThere were 56 (43%) missing BMI values in the PVLSI group.