Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 1;27(5):371–385. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2013.1077

Table 1.

Deposition Fraction as a Percentage of Emitted Dose

Aerosols DFinlet DFwye DFETT DFdevicea DFfilterb
CM wye
 MMAD=880 nm 3.1 (1.1)d 7.2 (3.5)d 2.1 (0.5)d 12.4 (4.2)d 87.6 (4.2)d
 MMAD=1.78 μm 2.9 (1.2)d 8.0 (4.5)d 9.3 (1.7)d 20.2 (5.0)d 79.8 (5.0)d
 MMAD=4.9 μm 5.6 (1.75) 25.6 (0.9) 40.7 (2.1) 87.7c (2.1) 12.3 (2.1)
SL wye
 MMAD=880 nm 3.7 (1.7) 1.6 (1.0)e 1.9 (0.5) 7.2 (2.9)e 92.8 (2.9)e
 MMAD=1.78 μm 2.5 (1.4) 1.6 (0.9)e 6.7 (0.7)e 10.9 (2.2)e 89.1 (2.2)e

The table presents mean (SD) deposition fraction (DF) as a percentage of dose emitted from the mixer (880-nm and 1.78-μm aerosols) or nebulizer (4.9-μm aerosol) at a steady-state flow rate of 5 L/min for the commercial (CM) and streamlined (SL) cases based on in vitro experiments.

a

Total device DF.

b

Equal to the emitted dose (ED) from the ETT.

c

Value includes a DF of 15.9% in the neonatal T-connector, which was not present in the other aerosol cases.

d

Statistically significant difference in DF compared with the DF observed for the 4.9-μm MMAD aerosol (p<0.05; t test).

e

Statistically significant difference in DF for the SL setup compared with the DF observed for the same sized aerosol delivered through the CM setup (p<0.05; t test).