Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 1;27(5):371–385. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2013.1077

Table 2.

CFD Predictions of Performance During Cyclic Breathing

Aerosols DFinlet+wye DFETT DFdevice ED Circuit exhaled dosea
CM wye T1
 MMAD=880 nm 22.4 3.2 25.6 42.3 32.1
 MMAD=1.78 μm 23.1 10.3 33.4 34.4 32.2
 MMAD=4.9 μm 29.7 32.0 61.7 10.3 28.0
CM wye T2
 MMAD=880 nm 10.3 5.2 15.5 77.4 7.1
 MMAD=1.78 μm 10.3 17.3 27.6 65.9 6.5
 MMAD=4.9 μm 16.0 56.5 72.5 19.9 7.6
SL wye T1
 MMAD=880 nm 5.8 2.4 8.2 54.5 37.3
 MMAD=1.78 μm 7.9 6.9 14.8 48.0 37.2
 MMAD=4.9 μm 17.3 36.4 53.7 18.3 28.0
SL wye T2
 MMAD=880 nm 3.7 3.6 7.3 80.3 12.4
 MMAD=1.78 μm 5.7 11.2 16.9 72.2 10.9
 MMAD=4.9 μm 15.1 55.6 70.7 26.0 3.3

The table presents CFD predictions of performance during cyclic breathing including deposition fractions (DFs) in the 10-cm tubing inlet+wye, ETT, and total device, emitted dose (ED) from the ETT, and exhaled dose lost from the ventilation circuit during expiration.

a

Fraction of dose (as %) lost from the delivery circuit during the exhalation phase of cyclic breathing. This fraction does not include the fraction of dose lost from the lung during exhalation, which is calculated in Table 3.