EspK, EspJ, and PPE68 are Esx-1 substrates.
(A) nLC–MRM
analysis of the levels of EspK in cell lysate (CL, blue bars) and
culture filtrate (CF, red bars) relative to the levels of EspK in
the WT M strain. The ΔRD1 and espK::Tn strains
served as a negative control for EspK detection and demonstrate specificity
of the approach. (B) nLC–MRM analysis of the levels of the
EspJ substrate in the CL and CF. The ΔRD1 strain and espJ::Tn strain serve as a negative control for EspJ detection.
We report a weak false positive signal indicating extremely low levels
of EspJ peptides in the espJ::Tn strain. One EspJ
peptide was observed at <0.5% of the levels in the espB::Tn strain and <0.2% of the EspJ levels observed in the WT M
strain. This low false-positive signal was due to the large EspJ signal
observed in the espB::Tn strain, which was the previous
nLC injection on the mass spectrometer. For example, the EspJ tryptic
peptide TSSMSTAADIYAK was present at ∼1e4cps2 in
the M strain and was not detected in ΔRD1 or the espJ::Tn strains. AEPLAVDPAR is a high-intensity proteotypic peptide
for EspJ that was measured at >2e6cps2 in the WT strain
and 1.3e6cps2 in the espB::Tn strain,
which was injected immediately prior to espJ::Tn
analysis. Further evidence of this is the gradual reduction in carryover
signal with each successive analysis of the espJ::Tn
strain. (C) nLC–MRM analysis of the levels of PPE68 in the
CL and CF. The ΔRD1 strain served as a negative control for
PPE68 detection. Error bars represent the average propagated standard
error and were calculated as described in the Experimental
Procedures. The differences between the levels of each protein
in the WT and each Esx-1-deficient strain were considered statistically
significant if p values were less than 0.05 based
on a two-tailed Student’s t test. The levels
of the indicated protein in each Esx-1-deficient strain were significantly
different from the wild-type levels with the following exceptions:
The levels of EspK in the cell lysates of the espG strain were not different from the levels of EspK in the wild-type
lysate. The levels of PPE68 in the cell lysate from the espJ strain were not significantly different from the wild-type strain.
The levels of PPE68 in the culture filtrate generated from the espK strain were not significantly different from the levels
of PPE68 in the culture filtrate from the wild-type strain. The actual p values are listed in Supplemental
Table S2. Log2 transformed versions of the CF data
are available in Supplemental Figure S4.